Knowledge-based planning for oesophageal cancers using a model trained with plans from a different treatment planning system

被引:17
|
作者
Ueda, Yoshihiro [1 ,2 ]
Miyazaki, Masayoshi [1 ]
Sumida, Iori [2 ]
Ohira, Shingo [1 ]
Tamura, Mikoto [3 ]
Monzen, Hajime [3 ]
Tsuru, Haruhi [1 ]
Inui, Shoki [1 ]
Isono, Masaru [1 ]
Ogawa, Kazuhiko [2 ]
Teshima, Teruki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 2-2 Yamada Oka, Suita, Osaka 5650071, Japan
[3] Kindai Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Med Phys, Osaka, Japan
关键词
MODULATED ARC THERAPY; CELL LUNG-CANCER; VMAT; HEAD; RADIOTHERAPY; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; IMRT;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2019.1691257
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to evaluate knowledge-based volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for oesophageal cancers using a model trained with plans optimised with a different treatment planning system (TPS) and to compare lung dose sparing in two TPSs, Eclipse and RayStation. Materials and methods: A total of 64 patients with stage I-III oesophageal cancers were treated using hybrid VMAT (H-VMAT) plans optimised using RayStation. Among them, 40 plans were used for training the model for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in RapidPlan. The remaining 24 plans were recalculated using RapidPlan to validate the KBP model. H-VMAT plans calculated using RapidPlan were compared with H-VMAT plans optimised using RayStation with respect to planning target volume doses, lung doses, and modulation complexity. Results: In the lung, there were significant differences between the volume ratios receiving doses in excess of 5, 10, and 20 Gy (V-5, V-10, and V-20). The V-5 for the lung with H-VMAT plans optimised using RapidPlan was significantly higher than that of H-VMAT plans optimised using RayStation (p < .01), with a mean difference of 10%. Compared to H-VMAT plans optimised using RayStation, the V-10 and V-20 for the lung were significantly lower with H-VMAT plans optimised using RapidPlan (p = .04 and p = .02), with differences exceeding 1.0%. In terms of modulation complexity, the change in beam output at each control point was more constant with H-VMAT plans optimised using RapidPlan than with H-VMAT plans optimised using RayStation. The range of the change with H-VMAT plans optimised using RapidPlan was one third that of H-VMAT plans optimised using RayStation. Conclusion: Two optimisers in Eclipse and RayStation had different dosimetric performance in lung sparing and modulation complexity. RapidPlan could not improve low lung doses, however, it provided an appreciate intermediated doses compared to plans optimised with RayStation.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 283
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using multi-centre data to train and validate a knowledge-based model for planning radiotherapy of the head and neck
    Frizzelle, Miranda
    Pediaditaki, Athanasia
    Thomas, Christopher
    South, Christopher
    Vanderstraeten, Reynald
    Wiessler, Wolfgang
    Adams, Elizabeth
    Jagadeesan, Surendran
    Lalli, Narinder
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 21 : 18 - 23
  • [32] Analysis of EORTC-1219-DAHANCA-29 trial plans demonstrates the potential of knowledge-based planning to provide patient-specific treatment plan quality assurance
    Tol, Jim P.
    Dahele, Max
    Gregoire, Vincent
    Overgaard, Jens
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 130 : 75 - 81
  • [33] Offline Quality Assurance for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans for NRG-HN001 Head and Neck Clinical Trial Using Knowledge-Based Planning
    Giaddui, Tawfik
    Geng, Huaizhi
    Chen, Quan
    Linnemann, Nancy
    Radden, Marsha
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Xia, Ping
    Xiao, Ying
    ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 5 (06) : 1342 - 1349
  • [34] Development and evaluation of a clinical model for lung cancer patients using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) within a knowledge-based algorithm for treatment planning
    Snyder, Karen Chin
    Kim, Jinkoo
    Reding, Anne
    Fraser, Corey
    Gordon, James
    Ajlouni, Munther
    Movsas, Benjamin
    Chetty, Indrin J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (06): : 263 - 275
  • [35] A knowledge-based quantitative approach to characterize treatment plan quality: Application to prostate VMAT planning
    Alnaalwa, Buthayna
    Nwankwo, Obioma
    Abo-Madyan, Yasser
    Giordano, Frank A.
    Wenz, Frederik
    Glatting, Gerhard
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (01) : 94 - 104
  • [36] A two-step treatment planning strategy incorporating knowledge-based planning for head-and-neck radiotherapy
    Liu, Han
    Sintay, Benjamin
    Wiant, David
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (06):
  • [37] Implement a knowledge-based automated dose volume histogram prediction module in Pinnacle3 treatment planning system for plan quality assurance and guidance
    Xu, Hao
    Lu, Jiayu
    Wang, Jiazhou
    Fan, Jiawei
    Hu, Weigang
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (08): : 134 - 140
  • [38] Creation of knowledge-based planning models intended for large scale distribution: Minimizing the effect of outlier plans
    Aviles, Jorge Edmundo Alpuche
    Marcos, Maria Isabel Cordero
    Sasaki, David
    Sutherland, Keith
    Kane, Bill
    Kuusela, Esa
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (03): : 215 - 226
  • [39] Performance of a knowledge-based planning model for optimizing intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for partial breast irradiation
    Frederick, Amy
    Roumeliotis, Michael
    Grendarova, Petra
    Quirk, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (03):
  • [40] Functional-guided radiotherapy using knowledge-based planning
    Faught, Austin M.
    Olsen, Lindsey
    Schubert, Leah
    Rusthoven, Chad
    Castillo, Edward
    Castillo, Richard
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Guerrero, Thomas
    Miften, Moyed
    Vinogradskiy, Yevgeniy
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 129 (03) : 494 - 498