Knowledge-based planning for oesophageal cancers using a model trained with plans from a different treatment planning system

被引:17
|
作者
Ueda, Yoshihiro [1 ,2 ]
Miyazaki, Masayoshi [1 ]
Sumida, Iori [2 ]
Ohira, Shingo [1 ]
Tamura, Mikoto [3 ]
Monzen, Hajime [3 ]
Tsuru, Haruhi [1 ]
Inui, Shoki [1 ]
Isono, Masaru [1 ]
Ogawa, Kazuhiko [2 ]
Teshima, Teruki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, 2-2 Yamada Oka, Suita, Osaka 5650071, Japan
[3] Kindai Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Med Phys, Osaka, Japan
关键词
MODULATED ARC THERAPY; CELL LUNG-CANCER; VMAT; HEAD; RADIOTHERAPY; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; IMRT;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2019.1691257
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to evaluate knowledge-based volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for oesophageal cancers using a model trained with plans optimised with a different treatment planning system (TPS) and to compare lung dose sparing in two TPSs, Eclipse and RayStation. Materials and methods: A total of 64 patients with stage I-III oesophageal cancers were treated using hybrid VMAT (H-VMAT) plans optimised using RayStation. Among them, 40 plans were used for training the model for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in RapidPlan. The remaining 24 plans were recalculated using RapidPlan to validate the KBP model. H-VMAT plans calculated using RapidPlan were compared with H-VMAT plans optimised using RayStation with respect to planning target volume doses, lung doses, and modulation complexity. Results: In the lung, there were significant differences between the volume ratios receiving doses in excess of 5, 10, and 20 Gy (V-5, V-10, and V-20). The V-5 for the lung with H-VMAT plans optimised using RapidPlan was significantly higher than that of H-VMAT plans optimised using RayStation (p < .01), with a mean difference of 10%. Compared to H-VMAT plans optimised using RayStation, the V-10 and V-20 for the lung were significantly lower with H-VMAT plans optimised using RapidPlan (p = .04 and p = .02), with differences exceeding 1.0%. In terms of modulation complexity, the change in beam output at each control point was more constant with H-VMAT plans optimised using RapidPlan than with H-VMAT plans optimised using RayStation. The range of the change with H-VMAT plans optimised using RapidPlan was one third that of H-VMAT plans optimised using RayStation. Conclusion: Two optimisers in Eclipse and RayStation had different dosimetric performance in lung sparing and modulation complexity. RapidPlan could not improve low lung doses, however, it provided an appreciate intermediated doses compared to plans optimised with RayStation.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 283
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inter-planner variation in treatment-plan quality of plans created with a knowledge-based treatment planning system
    Kubo, Kazuki
    Monzen, Hajime
    Ishii, Kentaro
    Tamura, Mikoto
    Nakasaka, Yuta
    Kusawake, Masayuki
    Kishimoto, Shun
    Nakahara, Ryuta
    Matsuda, Shogo
    Nakajima, Toshifumi
    Kawamorita, Ryu
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 67 : 132 - 140
  • [2] Dosimetric potential of knowledge-based planning model trained with HyperArc plans for brain metastases
    Sagawa, Tomohiro
    Ueda, Yoshihiro
    Tsuru, Haruhi
    Kamima, Tatsuya
    Ohira, Shingo
    Tamura, Mikoto
    Miyazaki, Masayoshi
    Monzen, Hajime
    Konishi, Koji
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (02):
  • [3] Evaluation of complexity and deliverability of prostate cancer treatment plans designed with a knowledge-based VMAT planning technique
    Wall, Phillip D. H.
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (01): : 69 - 77
  • [4] Knowledge-based model building for treatment planning for prostate cancer using commercial treatment planning quality assurance software tools
    Masumoto, Nagi
    Sasaki, Motoharu
    Nakaguchi, Yuji
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Kanazawa, Yuki
    Ikushima, Hitoshi
    RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 17 (01) : 337 - 345
  • [5] Improving knowledge-based treatment planning for lung cancer radiotherapy with automatic multi-criteria optimized training plans
    Fjellanger, Kristine
    Hordnes, Marte
    Sandvik, Inger Marie
    Sulen, Turid Husevag
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Rossi, Linda
    Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime
    Hysing, Liv Bolstad
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2023, 62 (10) : 1194 - 1200
  • [6] Reducing variability among treatment machines using knowledge-based planning for head and neck, pancreatic, and rectal cancer
    Hirashima, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Mukumoto, Nobutaka
    Ashida, Ryo
    Fujii, Kota
    Nakamura, Kiyonao
    Nakajima, Aya
    Sakanaka, Katsuyuki
    Yoshimura, Michio
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (07): : 245 - 254
  • [7] Knowledge-based IMRT planning for individual liver cancer patients using a novel specific model
    Yu, Gang
    Li, Yang
    Feng, Ziwei
    Tao, Cheng
    Yu, Zuyi
    Li, Baosheng
    Li, Dengwang
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13
  • [8] Using a knowledge-based planning solution to select patients for proton therapy
    Delaney, Alexander R.
    Dahele, Max
    Tol, Jim P.
    Kuijper, Ingrid T.
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 124 (02) : 263 - 270
  • [9] The effect of integrating knowledge-based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT
    Jayarathna, Sandun
    Shen, Xinglei
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Li, H. Harold
    Guida, Kenny
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (06):
  • [10] An interactive plan and model evolution method for knowledge-based pelvic VMAT planning
    Wang, Meijiao
    Li, Sha
    Huang, Yuliang
    Yue, Haizhen
    Li, Tian
    Wu, Hao
    Gao, Song
    Zhang, Yibao
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (05): : 491 - 498