Evaluation of a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias

被引:12
|
作者
Boriani, G
Wollmann, C
Biffi, M
Kühl, M
Schuchert, A
Sperzel, J
Stiller, S
Gasparini, G
Böcker, D
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Inst Cardiol, Policlin S Orsola, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Munster, Dept Cardiol, D-4400 Munster, Germany
[3] Guidant Inc, St Paul, MN USA
[4] Univ Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ Ulm, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2003年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
atrial tachyarrhythmia; atrialftbrillation; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; detection time; cardioversion; defibrillation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00072.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Eighty-nine patients with a documented history of atrial tachyarrhythmias or fibrillation (AF) received a cardioverter defibrillator designed to selectively differentiate and treat atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Twenty-two patients received a coronary sinus lead and, therefore, could use a separate shock vector for selective treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias/AE The device is designed to treat tachyarrhythmias with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and/or shock therapy using an atrial and/or a ventricular shock vector. Patients underwent induction and shock termination of atrial or dual tachyarrhythmias (AF/VF) to verify proper device function and to measure the arrhythmia detection time with enhancements and preventive algorithms programmed On and Off, respectively. Detection time for 329 VF inductions was 2.41 +/- 0.64 seconds with enhancements On and 2.29 +/- 0.47 with enhancements Off (NS). At implant or predischarge, 283 AF and/or AF/VF (121 atrial and 162 atrial/ventricular fibrillation) were induced. Shock conversion efficacy was 89.8% with AF conversion energies ranging from 0.9 to 27 J. Thirteen of the 23 patients had atrial shock conversions using the separate shock vector with an average conversion energy of 1.9 +/- 1.41. (range 0.5-5 J) A During follow-up the efficacy of ATP on atrial tachyarrhythmias was 59% and the efficacy of delivered shocks on AF was 85%. This new dual chamber cardioverter defibrillator appropriately detected and classified atrial arrhythmias, and shock therapy for AF was highly effective. The detection algorithm differentiated atrial tachyarrhythmia/AF and did not delay VF detection. The separate shock vector converted induced AF with energies ranging from 0.6 to 5 J.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 465
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experience with a dual chamber implantable defibrillator
    Kühlkamp, V
    Wilkoff, BL
    Brown, AB
    Volosin, KJ
    Hügl, BJ
    Stafford, W
    Cameron, DA
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 25 (07): : 1041 - 1048
  • [32] Ventricular Fibrillation due to Automated Atrial Threshold Testing in a Patient with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
    Schellevis, Mindel M.
    Van Halm, Vokko P.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (11): : 1355 - 1358
  • [33] Critical analysis of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator arrhythmia detection -: Results and technical considerations
    Wilkoff, BL
    Kühlkamp, V
    Volosin, K
    Ellenbogen, K
    Waldecker, B
    Kacet, S
    Gillberg, JM
    DeSouza, CM
    CIRCULATION, 2001, 103 (03) : 381 - 386
  • [34] Failure to deliver a shock in a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: A case report
    Sousa, Pedro A.
    Candeias, Rui
    Jesus, Ilidio
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2015, 34 (7-8) : 495.e1 - 495.e5
  • [35] Failure of a dual-chamber implantable-cardioverter-defibrillator to pace: Malfunction or normal function?
    Montgomery, Sarah
    Friedman, Peter L.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2009, 6 (02) : 281 - 282
  • [36] Complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator treatment in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
    Christensen, Alex Horby
    Platonov, Pyotr G.
    Svensson, Anneli
    Jensen, Henrik K.
    Rootwelt-Norberg, Christine
    Dahlberg, Pia
    Madsen, Trine
    Frederiksen, Tanja Charlotte
    Helio, Tiina
    Haugaa, Kristina H.
    Bundgaard, Henning
    Svendsen, Jesper H.
    EUROPACE, 2022, 24 (02): : 306 - 312
  • [37] Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation or replacement, and driving restriction consequences
    Marc, Thomas
    Benali, Karim
    Groussin, Pierre
    Rakza, Redwane
    Brito, Joana
    Behar, Nathalie
    Mabo, Philippe
    Pavin, Dominique
    Leclercq, Christophe
    Galand, Vincent
    Martins, Raphael P.
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2025, 118 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [38] Serial evaluation of atrial tachyarrhythmia burden and frequency after implantation of a dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator
    Schwartzman, D
    Gold, M
    Quesada, A
    Koehler, JL
    Mehra, R
    Euler, DE
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (07) : 708 - 713
  • [39] First worldwide clinical experience with a new dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator - Advantages and complications
    Sticherling, C
    Schaumann, A
    Klingenheben, T
    Hohnloser, SH
    EUROPACE, 1999, 1 (02): : 96 - 102
  • [40] Impact of Pulmonary Valve Replacement on Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Tetralogy of Fallot and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
    Bessiere, Francis
    Gardey, Kevin
    Bouzeman, Abdeslam
    Duthoit, Guillaume
    Koutbi, Linda
    Labombarda, Fabien
    Marquie, Christelle
    Gourraud, Jean Baptiste
    Mondoly, Pierre
    Sellal, Jean Marc
    Bordachar, Pierre
    Hermida, Alexis
    Anselme, Frederic
    Asselin, Anouk
    Audinet, Caroline
    Bernard, Yvette
    Boveda, Serge
    Chevalier, Philippe
    Clerici, Gael
    da Costa, Antoine
    de Guillebon, Maxime
    Defaye, Pascal
    Eschalier, Romain
    Garcia, Rodrigue
    Guenancia, Charles
    Guy-Moyat, Benoit
    Henaine, Roland
    Irles, Didier
    Iserin, Laurence
    Jourda, Francois
    Ladouceur, Magalie
    Lagrange, Philippe
    Laredo, Mikael
    Mansourati, Jacques
    Massoulie, Gregoire
    Mathiron, Amel
    Maury, Philippe
    Nguyen, Cedric
    Ninni, Sandro
    Perier, Marie-Cecile
    Pierre, Bertrand
    Sacher, Frederic
    Walton, Camille
    Winum, Pierre
    Martins, Raphael
    Pasquie, Jean Luc
    Thambo, Jean Benoit
    Jouven, Xavier
    Combes, Nicolas
    Di Filippo, Sylvie
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 7 (10) : 1285 - 1293