Multiple classifier systems for automatic sleep scoring in mice

被引:30
作者
Gao, Vance [1 ]
Turek, Fred [1 ]
Vitaterna, Martha [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Ctr Sleep & Circadian Biol, Dept Neurobiol, 2205 Tech Dr Hogan 2-160, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
Sleep; Sleep scoring; Autoscoring; Electroencephalogram; Mouse; Machine learning; Multiple classifier system; EEG SIGNAL CLASSIFICATION; RECOGNITION SYSTEM; MACHINE; RAT; ENSEMBLE; STATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.02.016
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG) recordings are often used in rodents to study sleep architecture and sleep-associated neural activity. These recordings must be scored to designate what sleep wake state the animal is in at each time point. Manual sleep-scoring is very time-consuming, so machine-learning classifier algorithms have been used to automate scoring. New method: Instead of using single classifiers, we implement a multiple classifier system. The multiple classifier is built from six base classifiers: decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, support vector machine, neural net, and linear discriminant analysis. Decision tree and k-nearest neighbors were improved into ensemble classifiers by using bagging and random subspace. Confidence scores from each classifier were combined to determine the final classification. Ambiguous epochs can be rejected and left for a human to classify. Results: Support vector machine was the most accurate base classifier, and had error rate of 0.054. The multiple classifier system reduced the error rate to 0.049, which was not significantly different from a second human scorer. When 10% of epochs were rejected, the remaining epochs' error rate dropped to 0.018. Comparison with existing method(s): Compared with the most accurate single classifier (support vector machine), the multiple classifier reduced errors by 9.4%. The multiple classifier surpassed the accuracy of a second human scorer after rejecting only 2% of epochs. Conclusions: Multiple classifier systems are an effective way to increase automated sleep scoring accuracy. Improvements in autoscoring will allow sleep researchers to increase sample sizes and recording lengths, opening new experimental possibilities. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 39
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Multiple classifier system for EEG signal classification with application to brain-computer interfaces
    Ahangi, Amir
    Karamnejad, Mehdi
    Mohammadi, Nima
    Ebrahimpour, Reza
    Bagheri, Nasoor
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2013, 23 (05) : 1319 - 1327
  • [2] Becq G, 2005, CLASSIFICATION CLUST
  • [3] EEG gamma frequency and sleep-wake scoring in mice: Comparing two types of supervised classifiers
    Brankack, Jurij
    Kukushka, Valeriy I.
    Vyssotski, Alexei L.
    Draguhn, Andreas
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 1322 : 59 - 71
  • [4] Breiman F, 1984, OLSHEN STONE CLASSIF
  • [5] Bagging predictors
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 1996, 24 (02) : 123 - 140
  • [6] Partitioning nominal attributes in decision trees
    Coppersmith, D
    Hong, SJ
    Hosking, JRM
    [J]. DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 1999, 3 (02) : 197 - 217
  • [7] Sleep-stage scoring in the rat using a support vector machine
    Crisler, Shelly
    Morrissey, Michael J.
    Anch, A. Michael
    Barnett, David W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2008, 168 (02) : 524 - 534
  • [8] Multiple classifier combination for face-based identity verification
    Czyz, J
    Kittler, J
    Vandendorpe, L
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2004, 37 (07) : 1459 - 1469
  • [9] Dement WC, 2011, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
  • [10] Efficient sleep stage recognition system based on EEG signal using k-means clustering based feature weighting
    Gunes, Salih
    Polat, Kemal
    Yosunkaya, Sebnem
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (12) : 7922 - 7928