Laparoscopic Pancreaticojejunostomy Using a Barbed Suture: A Novel Technique

被引:25
作者
Edil, Barish H. [1 ,2 ]
Cooper, Michol A. [1 ]
Makary, Martin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Surg, Denver, CO 80202 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2014年 / 24卷 / 12期
关键词
OPEN DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2014.0053
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The adoption of laparoscopy for the Whipple procedure remains limited in part by its technical difficulty. We sought to develop a superior, simpler pancreaticojejunostomy technique. Materials and Methods: We applied a running barbed suture (V-Loc (TM); Covidien, Mansfield, MA) to perform the pancreaticojejunostomy over a stent placed in the pancreatic duct and a small enterotomy in the jejunum. This technique was attempted in the last 19 of 37 patients presenting to two surgeons (M.A.M. and B.H.E.) for a laparoscopic Whipple procedure. Data were collected on operative time, pancreatic leak events, and related complications. Results: We successfully applied the modified technique in all 19 patients. Pancreatic leak occurred in 5% of patients with the modified technique (Grade A=0; Grade B=1; Grade C=0) and 11% with the standard technique (Grade A=1; Grade B=1; Grade C=0). All leaks were managed with external drainage. There were no leak-related complications. Mean operative time was shorter for the modified technique (mean, 367 minutes; range, 260-576 minutes) than the standard technique (mean, 440 minutes; range, 300-665 minutes). Conclusions: The use of a running barbed suture for laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy is a safe and efficient technique. Our operative times were decreased with this technique, and our outcomes were similar to other laparoscopic Whipple series.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 891
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study [J].
Abu Hilal, Mohammad ;
Hamdan, Mohammed ;
Di Fabio, Francesco ;
Pearce, Neil W. ;
Johnson, Colin D. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06) :1670-1674
[2]   Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systematic review of the literature [J].
Ammori, Basil J. ;
Ayiomamitis, Georgios D. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (07) :2084-2099
[3]   Laparoscopic vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overall Outcomes and Severity of Complications Using the Accordion Severity Grading System [J].
Asbun, Horacio J. ;
Stauffer, John A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 215 (06) :810-819
[4]   Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume centre: Results on 150 consecutive patients [J].
Bassi, C ;
Falconi, M ;
Salvia, R ;
Mascetta, G ;
Molinari, E ;
Pederzoli, P .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 18 (06) :453-457
[5]  
Boutros C, 2011, AM SURGEON, V77, P1526
[6]  
Cameron JL, 2006, ANN SURG, V244, P10, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea
[7]  
Cunha AS, 2008, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V143, P289, DOI 10.1001/archsurg.143.3.289
[8]   Are major laparoscopic pancreatic resections worthwhile? A prospective study of 32 patients in a single institution [J].
Dulucq, JL ;
Wintringer, P ;
Stabilini, C ;
Feryn, T ;
Perissat, J ;
Mahajna, A .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (08) :1028-1034
[9]   Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: review of the literature [J].
Gagner, Michel ;
Palermo, Mariano .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2009, 16 (06) :726-730
[10]   Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of comparative studies [J].
Jusoh, Asri C. ;
Ammori, Basil J. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (04) :904-913