Exercise stress testing, myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for detecting restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a review of performance

被引:39
作者
Dori, G
Denekamp, Y
Fishman, S
Bitterman, H
机构
[1] Carmel Hosp, Dept Internal Med A, IL-34362 Haifa, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[3] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Phys, Haifa, Israel
关键词
diagnosis of restenosis; percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; restenosis; stress testing;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2796.2003.01101.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
When chest symptoms recur in a patient who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), it is necessary to rule out restenosis (R). Three main noninvasive tests suggest the presence of R: exercise stress test (XT), myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and stress echocardiography (s-echo). The objectives of this review were: (1) to estimate the pretest probability of R as a function of time after PTCA in symptomatic patients and (2) to obtain an approximation of the diagnostic parameters of the XT, MPI and s-echo for detecting R. A MEDLINE search (English-language, years: 1980-2001) was conducted to identify studies examining post-PTCA functional testing for diagnosing R. Data from the studies were pooled. Comparing studies was often difficult due to varying methodology in the studies. Pretest probability of R in symptomatic patients increases in a nonlinear fashion from 20% or less at 1 month, to nearly 90% at 1-year postangioplasty. The approximated accuracy of the XT, MPI, and s-echo for detecting R was 62, 82 and 84%, respectively. During the first month after PTCA, none of the noninvasive modalities is able to accurately detect R. Late (7-9 months) after PTCA, the pretest probability of R is high and therefore the noninvasive measure may be spared. Our analysis suggests that MPI and s-echo should be preferred over the XT for diagnosing R.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 262
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Detection of high-grade restenosis after PTCA using contrast-enhanced electron beam CT [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Moshage, W ;
Bachmann, K .
CIRCULATION, 1997, 96 (09) :2785-2788
[2]   Coronary artery stenting [J].
Ashby, DT ;
Dangas, G ;
Mehran, R ;
Leon, MB .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2002, 56 (01) :83-102
[3]   DETECTION OF RESTENOSIS AFTER ELECTIVE PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY USING THE EXERCISE TREADMILL TEST [J].
BENGTSON, JR ;
MARK, DB ;
HONAN, MB ;
RENDALL, DS ;
HINOHARA, T ;
STACK, RS ;
HLATKY, MA ;
CALIFF, RM ;
LEE, KL ;
PRYOR, DB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1990, 65 (01) :28-34
[4]   Medical progress: Advances in coronary angioplasty [J].
Bittl, JA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (17) :1290-1302
[5]   CLINICAL, PHYSIOLOGICAL, ANATOMIC AND PROCEDURAL FACTORS PREDICTIVE OF RESTENOSIS AFTER PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY [J].
BOURASSA, MG ;
LESPERANCE, J ;
EASTWOOD, C ;
SCHWARTZ, L ;
COTE, G ;
KAZIM, F ;
HUDON, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1991, 18 (02) :368-376
[6]   STRESS TL-201 IMAGING AFTER CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY PREDICTS RESTENOSIS AND RECURRENT SYMPTOMS [J].
BREISBLATT, WM ;
WEILAND, FL ;
SPACCAVENTO, LJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 12 (05) :1199-1204
[7]  
Califf RM, 1991, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V17, p2B
[8]   Prediction of restenosis after successful percutaneous coronary angioplasty by dobutamine thallium-201 scintigraphy [J].
Caner, B ;
Oto, A ;
Ovunc, K ;
Kiratli, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 66 (02) :175-181
[9]   IN-HOSPITAL AND ONE-YEAR ECONOMIC OUTCOMES AFTER CORONARY STENTING OR BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY - RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
COHEN, DJ ;
KRUMHOLZ, HM ;
SUKIN, CA ;
HO, KKL ;
SIEGRIST, RB ;
CLEMAN, M ;
HEUSER, RR ;
BRINKER, JA ;
MOSES, JW ;
SAVAGE, MP ;
DETRE, K ;
LEON, MB ;
BAIM, DS .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (09) :2480-2487
[10]   DETECTION OF RESTENOSIS WITH DOBUTAMINE STRESS TEST AFTER CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY [J].
COMACANELLA, I ;
DAZA, NS ;
ORBE, LC .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1992, 124 (05) :1196-1204