Scrutinising the Gap between the Expected and Actual Deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage-A Bibliometric Analysis

被引:34
作者
Viebahn, Peter [1 ]
Chappin, Emile J. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuppertal Inst Climate Environm & Energy, Doeppersberg 19, D-42103 Wuppertal, Germany
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Jaffalaan 5, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
关键词
carbon capture and storage; deployment of CCS; expectation and reality; review; bibliometrics; bibliographic coupling; citations; SAVING PATHWAY EXPLORATION; POSTCOMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE; CHINA POWER SECTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; DIOXIDE CAPTURE; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; TECHNOECONOMIC PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.3390/en11092319
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
For many years, carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been discussed as a technology that may make a significant contribution to achieving major reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. At present, however, only two large-scale power plants capture a total of 2.4 Mt CO2/a. Several reasons are identified for this mismatch between expectations and realised deployment. Applying bibliographic coupling, the research front of CCS, understood to be published peer-reviewed papers, is explored to scrutinise whether the current research is sufficient to meet these problems. The analysis reveals that research is dominated by technical research (69%). Only 31% of papers address non-technical issues, particularly exploring public perception, policy, and regulation, providing a broader view on CCS implementation on the regional or national level, or using assessment frameworks. This shows that the research is advancing and attempting to meet the outlined problems, which are mainly non-technology related. In addition to strengthening this research, the proportion of papers that adopt a holistic approach may be increased in a bid to meet the challenges involved in transforming a complex energy system. It may also be useful to include a broad variety of stakeholders in research so as to provide a more resilient development of CCS deployment strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 225 条
[1]   A generalized cubic equation of state with application to pure CO2 injection in aquifers [J].
Aavatsmark, Ivar ;
Kometa, Bawfeh Kingsley ;
Gasda, Sarah E. ;
Sandve, Tor Harald ;
Nilsen, Halvor Moll .
COMPUTATIONAL GEOSCIENCES, 2016, 20 (03) :623-635
[2]   European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments [J].
Abadie, Luis M. ;
Chamorro, Jose M. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (06) :2992-3015
[3]   Evaluation of two alternative carbon capture and storage technologies: A stochastic model [J].
Abadie, Luis M. ;
Galarraga, Ibon ;
Ruebbelke, Dirk .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 54 :182-195
[4]   A meta-analysis of carbon capture and storage technology assessments: Understanding the driving factors of variability in cost estimates [J].
Akbilgic, Oguz ;
Doluweera, Ganesh ;
Mahmoudkhani, Maryam ;
Bergerson, Joule .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 159 :11-18
[5]   Comparative techno-economic assessment of biomass and coal with CCS technologies in a pulverized combustion power plant in the United Kingdom [J].
Al-Qayim, Khalidah ;
Nimmo, William ;
Pourkashanian, Mohammed .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 43 :82-92
[6]   Multiscale design and analysis of CO2 capture, transport and storage networks [J].
Alhajaj, Ahmed ;
Mac Dowell, Niall ;
Shah, Nilay .
GHGT-11, 2013, 37 :2552-2561
[7]   Reduced-order modelling of flexible CCS and assessment using short-term resource scheduling approach [J].
Alie, Colin ;
Elkamel, Ali ;
Douglas, Peter L. ;
Croiset, Eric .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 48 :253-274
[8]   The trouble with negative emissions [J].
Anderson, Kevin ;
Peters, Glen .
SCIENCE, 2016, 354 (6309) :182-183
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2009, technology roadmap - carbon capture and storage
[10]   Renewable energy and carbon capture and sequestration for a reduced carbon energy plan: An optimization model [J].
Arnette, Andrew N. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 70 :254-265