Combining OWL ontologies using ε-Connections

被引:43
|
作者
Grau, Bernardo Cuenca
Parsia, Bijan
Sirin, Evren
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, MIND Lab, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Valencia, Dept Informat, E-46100 Valencia, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF WEB SEMANTICS | 2006年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
Web Ontology Language; integration and combination of ontologies; combination of knowledge representation formalisms; description logics reasoning;
D O I
10.1016/j.websem.2005.09.010
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The standardization of the Web Ontology Language ( OWL) leaves ( at least) two crucial issues for Web-based ontologies unsatisfactorily resolved, namely how to represent and reason with multiple distinct, but linked ontologies, and how to enable effective knowledge reuse and sharing on the Semantic Web. In this paper, we present a solution for these fundamental problems based on E- Connections. We aim to use E- Connections to provide modelers with suitable means for developing Web ontologies in a modular way and to provide an alternative to the owl: imports construct. With such motivation, we present in this paper a syntactic and semantic extension of the Web Ontology language that covers E- Connections of OWL-DL ontologies. We show how to use such an extension as an alternative to the owl: imports construct in many modeling situations. We investigate different combinations of the logics SHIN( D), SHON( D) and SHIO( D) for which it is possible to design and implement reasoning algorithms, well- suited for optimization. Finally, we provide support for E-Connections in both an ontology editor, SWOOP, and an OWL reasoner, Pellet. (c) 2005 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 59
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Automatic Generation of Semantic Features and Lexical Relations Using OWL Ontologies
    Al-Yahya, Maha
    Al-Khalifa, Hend
    Bahanshal, Alia
    Al-Oudah, Iman
    NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 6716 : 15 - 26
  • [42] C-OWL: Contextualizing ontologies
    Bouquet, P
    Giunchiglia, F
    van Harmelen, F
    Serafini, L
    Stuckenschmidt, H
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2003, 2003, 2870 : 164 - 179
  • [43] Mapping ER Schemas to OWL Ontologies
    Myroshnichenko, Igor
    Murphy, Marguerite C.
    2009 IEEE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SEMANTIC COMPUTING (ICSC 2009), 2009, : 324 - 329
  • [44] Semantic Mutation Test to OWL Ontologies
    Porn, Alex Mateus
    Peres, Leticia Mara
    ICEIS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS - VOL 2, 2017, : 434 - 441
  • [45] A method to integrate business registries by using OWL-S ontologies
    Lee, KH
    Lee, TK
    Lee, KC
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEXT GENERATION WEB SERVICES PRACTICES, 2005, : 131 - 136
  • [46] OBO to OWL: a protege OWL tab to read/save OBO ontologies
    Moreira, Dilvan A.
    Musen, Mark A.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 23 (14) : 1868 - 1870
  • [47] A model driven approach for building OWL DL and OWL full ontologies
    Brockmans, Saartje
    Colomb, Robert M.
    Haase, Peter
    Kendall, Elisa F.
    Wallace, Evan K.
    Welty, Chris
    Xie, Guo Tong
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISEC 2006, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4273 : 187 - 200
  • [48] Preserving Semantics of Owl 2 Ontologies in Relational Databases Using Hybrid Approach
    Vysniauskas, Ernestas
    Nemuraite, Lina
    Paradauskas, Bronius
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROL, 2012, 41 (02): : 103 - 115
  • [49] Logical connections of statements in ontologies
    Cao, Cungen
    Sui, Yuefei
    Sun, Yu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFORMATICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 440 - 446
  • [50] Authoring Business Rules Grounded in OWL Ontologies
    Chniti, Amina
    Dehors, Sylvain
    Albert, Patrick
    Charlet, Jean
    SEMANTIC WEB RULES, 2010, 6403 : 297 - +