Combining OWL ontologies using ε-Connections

被引:43
|
作者
Grau, Bernardo Cuenca
Parsia, Bijan
Sirin, Evren
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, MIND Lab, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Valencia, Dept Informat, E-46100 Valencia, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF WEB SEMANTICS | 2006年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
Web Ontology Language; integration and combination of ontologies; combination of knowledge representation formalisms; description logics reasoning;
D O I
10.1016/j.websem.2005.09.010
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The standardization of the Web Ontology Language ( OWL) leaves ( at least) two crucial issues for Web-based ontologies unsatisfactorily resolved, namely how to represent and reason with multiple distinct, but linked ontologies, and how to enable effective knowledge reuse and sharing on the Semantic Web. In this paper, we present a solution for these fundamental problems based on E- Connections. We aim to use E- Connections to provide modelers with suitable means for developing Web ontologies in a modular way and to provide an alternative to the owl: imports construct. With such motivation, we present in this paper a syntactic and semantic extension of the Web Ontology language that covers E- Connections of OWL-DL ontologies. We show how to use such an extension as an alternative to the owl: imports construct in many modeling situations. We investigate different combinations of the logics SHIN( D), SHON( D) and SHIO( D) for which it is possible to design and implement reasoning algorithms, well- suited for optimization. Finally, we provide support for E-Connections in both an ontology editor, SWOOP, and an OWL reasoner, Pellet. (c) 2005 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 59
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combining Multiple Ontologies using E-connections
    Zheng, Shuling
    Tang, Suqin
    Sunderraman, Rajshekhar
    INDUSTRIAL INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, PTS 1-4, 2013, 241-244 : 2601 - +
  • [2] oMAP: Combining classifiers for aligning automatically OWL ontologies
    Straccia, U
    Troncy, R
    WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING - WISE 2005, 2005, 3806 : 133 - 147
  • [3] ONToTRACK: Combining browsing and editing with reasoning and explaining for OWL Lite ontologies
    Liebig, T
    Noppens, O
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2004, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3298 : 244 - 258
  • [4] Versioning OWL Ontologies using Temporal Tags
    Bedi, Punam
    Marwaha, Sudeep
    PROCEEDINGS OF WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 21, 2007, 21 : 332 - 337
  • [5] OntOWLClean: Cleaning OWL ontologies with OWL
    Welty, Chris
    FORMAL ONTOLOGY IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 150 : 347 - 359
  • [6] Visual modeling of OWL DL ontologies using UML
    Brockmans, S
    Volz, R
    Eberhart, A
    Löffler, P
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2004, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3298 : 198 - 213
  • [7] Patching syntax in OWL ontologies
    Bechhofer, S
    Volz, R
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2004, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3298 : 668 - 682
  • [8] OWL2Vec*: embedding of OWL ontologies
    Jiaoyan Chen
    Pan Hu
    Ernesto Jimenez-Ruiz
    Ole Magnus Holter
    Denvar Antonyrajah
    Ian Horrocks
    Machine Learning, 2021, 110 : 1813 - 1845
  • [9] Introducing Defeasibility into OWL Ontologies
    Casini, Giovanni
    Meyer, Thomas
    Moodley, Kody
    Sattler, Uli
    Varzinczak, Ivan
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2015, PT II, 2015, 9367 : 409 - 426
  • [10] Consistent evolution of OWL ontologies
    Haase, P
    Stojanovic, L
    SEMANTIC WEB: RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3532 : 182 - 197