Fundamental nursing care: A systematic review of the evidence on the effect of nursing care interventions for nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene

被引:86
作者
Richards, David A. [1 ]
Hilli, Angelique [1 ]
Pentecost, Claire [1 ]
Goodwin, Victoria A. [1 ]
Frost, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, Inst Hlth Res, St Lukes Campus, Exeter, Devon, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
fundamental care; experimental design; nursing; systematic review; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CATHETERS; PROTOCOL; HYSTERECTOMY; PNEUMONIA; STANDARD; OUTCOMES; REMOVAL; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.14150
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectivesTo determine the effects of nursing interventions for people's nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene needs. BackgroundPatient experience of health care is sensitive to nursing quality. A refocus on fundamental nursing care is undermined by lack of evidence of effectiveness for interventions in core areas such as elimination, nutrition, mobility and hygiene. DesignSystematic review. MethodsWe searched for and included experimental studies on interventions by professionally qualified and unregistered nurses that addressed participants' nutrition, elimination, mobility and hygiene needs. We extracted data on scope, quality and results of studies followed by descriptive narrative synthesis of included study outcomes using a novel form of harvest plots. ResultsWe included 149 studies, 35 nutrition, 56 elimination, 16 mobility, 39 hygiene and three addressing two or more areas simultaneously (67 randomised controlled trials, 32 non-randomised controlled trials and 50 uncontrolled trials). Studies into interventions on participant self-management of nutrition (n=25), oral health (n=26), catheter care (n=23) and self-management of elimination (n=21) were the most prevalent. Most studies focussed their outcomes on observational or physiological measures, with very few collecting patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life, experience or self-reported symptoms. All but 13 studies were of low quality and at significant risk of bias. The majority of studies did not define primary outcomes, included multiple measures of identical concepts, used inappropriate analyses and did not conform to standard reporting quality criteria. ConclusionsThe current evidence for fundamental nursing care interventions is sparse, of poor quality and unfit to provide evidence-based guidance to practising nurses. Relevance to clinical practiceResearchers in nursing internationally should now undertake a programme of work to produce evidence for clinical practice in the fundamentals of care that is reliable, replicable and robust.
引用
收藏
页码:2179 / 2188
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study [J].
Aiken, Linda H. ;
Sloane, Douglas M. ;
Bruyneel, Luk ;
Van den Heede, Koen ;
Griffiths, Peter ;
Busse, Reinhard ;
Diomidous, Marianna ;
Kinnunen, Juha ;
Kozka, Maria ;
Lesaffre, Emmanuel ;
McHugh, Matthew D. ;
Moreno-Casbas, M. T. ;
Rafferty, Anne Marie ;
Schwendimann, Rene ;
Scott, P. Anne ;
Tishelman, Carol ;
van Achterberg, Theo ;
Sermeus, Walter .
LANCET, 2014, 383 (9931) :1824-1830
[2]   A prospective, randomized trial comparing immediate versus delayed catheter removal following hysterectomy [J].
Alessandri, Franco ;
Mistrangelo, Emanuela ;
Lijoi, Davide ;
Ferrero, Simone ;
Ragni, Nicola .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (06) :716-720
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, COMPLEX INTERVENTION
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Transforming care: A national response to Winterbourne View Hospital
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, AD ADM PAT SURV 2013
[8]  
[Anonymous], COMP PRACT
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, AUD CHILDR SOC CAR O
[10]   'Care left undone' during nursing shifts: associations with workload and perceived quality of care [J].
Ball, Jane E. ;
Murrells, Trevor ;
Rafferty, Anne Marie ;
Morrow, Elizabeth ;
Griffiths, Peter .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2014, 23 (02) :116-125