The Data Behind Risk Analysis of Campylobacter Jejuni and Campylobacter Coli Infections

被引:10
作者
Ben Romdhane, Racem [1 ]
Merle, Roswitha [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Vet Epidemiol & Biostat, Fac Vet Med, Berlin, Germany
来源
FIGHTING CAMPYLOBACTER INFECTIONS: TOWARDS A ONE HEALTH APPROACH | 2021年 / 431卷
关键词
HOUSED BROILER FLOCKS; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; THERMOPHILIC CAMPYLOBACTERS; REDUCE CAMPYLOBACTER; SOURCE ATTRIBUTION; FEED WITHDRAWAL; UNITED-STATES; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; SALMONELLA-TYPHIMURIUM;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-65481-8_2
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli are major causes of food-borne enteritis in humans. Poultry meat is known to be responsible for a large proportion of cases of human campylobacteriosis. However, other food-borne, environmental and animal sources are frequently associated with the disease in humans as well. Human campylobacteriosis causes gastroenteritis that in most cases is self-limiting. Nevertheless, the burden of the disease is relatively large compared with other food-borne diseases, which is mostly due to rare but long-lasting symptoms related to immunological sequelae. In order to pave the way to improved surveillance and control of human campylobacteriosis, we review here the data that is typically used for risk analysis to quantify the risk and disease burden, identify specific surveillance strategies and assist in choosing the most effective control strategies. Such data are mostly collected from the literature, and their nature is discussed here, for each of the three processes that are essential for a complete risk analysis procedure: risk assessment, risk management and risk communication. Of these, the first, risk assessment, is most dependent on data, and this process is subdivided into the steps of hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment and risk characterization. For each of these steps of risk assessment, information from published material that is typically collected will be summarized here. In addition, surveillance data are highly valuable for risk assessments. Different surveillance systems are employed in different countries, which can make international comparison of data challenging. Risk analysis typically results in targeted control strategies, and these again differ between countries. The applied control strategies are as yet not sufficient to eradicate human campylobacteriosis. The surveillance tools of Campylobacter in humans and exposure sources in place in different countries are briefly reviewed to better understand the Campylobacter dynamics and guide control strategies. Finally, the available control measures on different risk factors and exposure sources are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 58
页数:34
相关论文
共 224 条
[51]   Risk factors for indigenous Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli infections in The Netherlands: a case-control study [J].
Doorduyn, Y. ;
Van den Brandhof, W. E. ;
Van Duynhoven, Y. T. H. P. ;
Breukink, B. J. ;
Wagenaar, J. A. ;
Van Pelt, W. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2010, 138 (10) :1391-1404
[52]   ISOLATION OF CAMPYLOBACTER-JEJUNI FROM RETAIL MUSHROOMS [J].
DOYLE, MP ;
SCHOENI, JL .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 51 (02) :449-450
[53]  
ECDC, 2019, ANN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL
[54]   Genotypic diversity of Campylobacter lari isolated from mussels and oysters in The Netherlands [J].
Endtz, HP ;
Vliegenthart, JS ;
Vandamme, P ;
Weverink, HW ;
vandenBraak, NP ;
Verbrugh, HA ;
vanBelkum, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 34 (01) :79-88
[55]   Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in US dairy cattle [J].
Englen, M. D. ;
Hill, A. E. ;
Dargatz, D. A. ;
Ladely, S. R. ;
Fedorka-Cray, P. J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 102 (06) :1570-1577
[56]   The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2014 [J].
European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (12)
[58]  
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Group, 2005, EFSA J, V3, P173, DOI [10.2903/J.EFSA.2005.173, DOI 10.2903/J.EFSA.2005.173, 10.2903/j.efsa.2005.173]
[59]  
Fabech B, 2002, PRACTICAL APPROACH A, P510
[60]  
Facciola A, 2017, J Prev Med Hyg, V58, pE79