Recombination factors for the cylindrical FC65-G ionization chamber in pulsed photon beams and the plane-parallel Roos ionization chamber in pulsed electron beams

被引:17
作者
Berg, M
Noerrevang, O
机构
[1] Vejle Hosp, Dept Med Phys, DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/49/23/008
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The use of ionization chambers in linac radiotherapy dosimetry requires various corrections to the measured charges, one of these being the recombination correction. The recombination correction factor (k(s)) is generally estimated from the two-voltage analysis (TVA) for each beam quality. However. it is possible that the ionization chamber above some threshold polarizing voltage does not follow the accepted Boag theory very well. Secondly the TVA is time-consuming as the chamber needs to stabilize after each polarizing voltage change and since it must be performed for each beam quality. Another approach consists in using the fact that ks is predicted to depend linearly on dose per pulse by Boag theory: determining this relationship once and for all using a multi-voltage analysis (MVA), one also checks the range validity of the Boag theory for the chamber considered. This work presents a thorough analysis of ks dependence on dose per pulse of FC65-G (cylindrical) and Roos (plane-parallel) ionization chambers in pulsed photon and electron beams, respectively. Within the uncertainties, the recombination factors are found to be independent of beam quality, and no deviation from the Boag theory is observed within the tested range of polarizing voltages. Before adapting the equations given using the MVA other users should check that their ionization chambers show the same dose per pulse dependence using the TVA for a few beam qualities.
引用
收藏
页码:5309 / 5318
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international Codes of Practice [J].
Andreo, P ;
Huq, MS ;
Westermark, M ;
Song, HJ ;
Tilikidis, A ;
DeWerd, L ;
Shortt, K .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (17) :3033-3053
[2]  
Andreo P, 2000, IAEA TECHNICAL REPOR, V398
[3]  
[Anonymous], 34 ICRU
[4]  
ATTIX F. H., 1986, Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry
[5]   The effect of free-electron collection on the recombination correction to ionization measurements of pulsed radiation [J].
Boag, JW ;
Hochhauser, E ;
Balk, OA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (05) :885-897
[6]  
Boag JW., 1987, The Dosimetry of Ionizing Radiation
[7]  
BOAG JW, 1966, RAD DOSIMETRY, V2
[8]   Ion recombination corrections for the NACP parallel-plate chamber in a pulsed electron beam [J].
Burns, DT ;
McEwen, MR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (08) :2033-2045
[9]   SATURATION CORRECTION FOR THE NE 2560/1 DOSIMETER IN PHOTON DOSIMETRY [J].
BURNS, JE ;
ROSSER, KE .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (05) :687-693
[10]   Saturation current and collection efficiency for ionization chambers in pulsed beams [J].
DeBlois, F ;
Zankowski, C ;
Podgorsak, EB .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (05) :1146-1155