Comparison of CT and MR imaging for the detection of extranodal neoplastic spread in metastatic neck nodes

被引：96
作者：
King, AD
Tse, GMK
Yuen, EHY
To, EWH
Vlantis, AC
Zee, B
Chan, ABW
van Hasselt, AC
Ahuja, AT
机构：
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol & Organ Imaging, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Anat & Cellular Pathol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] St Teresas Hosp, Oral Maxillofacial Surg Ctr, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Oncol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源：
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2004年 / 52卷 / 03期
关键词：
head and neck neoplasms; lymphatic system; CT; MR; US; sensitivity and specificity;
D O I：
10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.03.004
中图分类号：
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要：
Purpose: To compare computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the detection of extranodal neoplastic spread (ENS) in metastatic cervical nodes from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Materials and methods: 17 patients with a squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck underwent CT and MR imaging. The neck nodes were assessed for ENS and the results compared using pathology from the surgical resection. Results: Radiologic-pathologic correlation was performed in 51 malignant nodes. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were respectively 73, 65, 93% for CT, and 80, 78, 86% for MR imaging. Comparison of CT and MR imaging showed that there was no significant difference between the two modalities for either sensitivity (P = 0.1317) or specificity (P = 0.3173). Conclusion: CT and MR imaging are comparable for the detection of ENS. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：264 / 270
页数：7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] Usefulness of fat-suppression magnetic resonance imaging for oral and maxillofacial lesions
    Kitagawa, Y
    Ishii, Y
    Kawamura, Y
    Hayashi, K
    Ogasawara, T
    Morihiro, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 25 (06) : 457 - 462
  • [12] Neck dissection in oral cancer - clinical review and analysis of prognostic factors
    Kokemueller, H
    Brachvogel, P
    Eckardt, A
    Hausamen, JE
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 31 (06) : 608 - 614
  • [13] LYMPH-NODE INVASION IN HYPOPHARYNX AND LATERAL EPILARYNX CARCINOMA - A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR
    LEFEBVRE, JL
    CASTELAIN, B
    DELATORRE, JC
    DELOBELLEDEROIDE, A
    VANKEMMEL, B
    [J]. HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1987, 10 (01): : 14 - 18
  • [14] Myers JN, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V92, P3030, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20011215)92:12<3030::AID-CNCR10148>3.0.CO
  • [15] 2-P
  • [16] Lymph node pathology - Benign proliferative, lymphoma, and metastatic disease
    Sakai, O
    Curtin, HD
    Romo, LV
    Som, PM
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 38 (05) : 979 - +
  • [17] CARCINOMA OF ORAL CAVITY - FACTORS AFFECTING TREATMENT FAILURE AT PRIMARY SITE AND NECK
    SHAH, JP
    CENDON, RA
    FARR, HW
    STRONG, EW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1976, 132 (04) : 504 - 507
  • [18] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF NECK NODE METASTASIS
    SNOW, GB
    ANNYAS, AA
    VANSLOOTEN, EA
    BARTELINK, H
    HART, AAM
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1982, 7 (03) : 185 - 192
  • [19] SNYDERMAN NL, 1985, CANCER, V56, P1597, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19851001)56:7<1597::AID-CNCR2820560722>3.0.CO
  • [20] 2-5
123