Why do psychotherapists participate in psychotherapy research and why not? Results of the Attitudes to Psychotherapy Research Questionnaire with a sample of experienced German psychotherapists

被引:14
作者
Taubner, Svenja [1 ]
Klasen, Jennifer [2 ]
Munder, Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] Alpen Adria Univ Klagenfurt, Dept Psychol, Klagenfurt, Austria
[2] Univ Kassel, Dept Psychol, D-34125 Kassel, Germany
[3] Psychol Hsch Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
factor analysis; psychotherapists; validation; attitudes to psychotherapy research; qualitative research methods; THERAPISTS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1080/10503307.2014.938256
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Psychotherapy research needs to convince psychotherapists to contribute their time and effort to participate. The present paper describes the development and first results of the Attitudes to Psychotherapy Research Questionnaire (APRQ). Method: The APRQ and additional qualitative questions about exclusion criteria for participation were filled out by a sample of 365 therapists (psychoanalytic, psychodynamic, and cognitive-behavioral) during an Internet-based research survey. Results: A principle component analysis yielded six factors: Benefits, Damage, Legitimation, Self-doubt, Effectiveness Doubt and External Reasons. Age, external reasons and benefits predicted willingness to participate independent of therapeutic school. Discussion: Results show a changing trend to more positive attitudes to psychotherapy research. To be willing to participate in future research, therapists expected high quality designs, financial compensation, and personal gains.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 331
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   PROFESSIONAL RESEARCH COMMITMENT - A SYMPTOM OR A SYNDROME [J].
BEDNAR, RL ;
SHAPIRO, JG .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 34 (03) :323-&
[2]  
Buhner M., 2006, Einfuhrung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion, V2
[3]   How treating psychoanalysts respond to psychotherapy research constraints [J].
Busch, FN ;
Milrod, BL ;
Rudden, M ;
Shapiro, T ;
Roiphe, J ;
Singer, M ;
Aronson, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PSYCHOANALYTIC ASSOCIATION, 2001, 49 (03) :961-984
[4]  
Cohen J., 2013, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203774441
[5]  
Cohen J, 2013, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[6]   RESEARCH READERSHIP AND INFORMATION SOURCE RELIANCE OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS [J].
COHEN, LH .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 10 (06) :780-785
[7]  
Elliott R., 1994, Psychotherapy research and practice, P124
[8]   A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
HORN, JL .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1965, 30 (02) :179-185
[9]  
JUTTEMANN G, 2009, KOMPARATIVE KASUISTI
[10]  
Margreiter, 2007, PSYCHOTHERAPIE FORUM, V15, P192, DOI [10.1007/s00729-007-0214-1, DOI 10.1007/S00729-007-0214-1]