Rates of Revision and Device Failure in Cochlear Implant Surgery: A 30-Year Experience

被引:112
|
作者
Wang, Jeffrey T. [1 ]
Wang, Allen Y. [1 ]
Psarros, Colleen [2 ]
Da Cruz, Melville [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Dept Otolaryngol, Westmead Hosp, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Sydney Cochlear Implant Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Cochlear implant; revision surgery; revision rate; reimplantation; explantation; device failure; device failure rate; hard failure; soft failure; SURGICAL TECHNIQUES; REIMPLANTATION; CHILDREN; COMPLICATIONS; ADULTS; PERFORMANCE; RECIPIENTS;
D O I
10.1002/lary.24649
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/HypothesisTo characterize revision cochlear implant surgery and quantify rates of revision and device failure. Study DesignRetrospective review of 235 cases of revision cochlear implant surgery performed at the Sydney Cochlear Implant Center over a period of 30 years, between January 1982 and June 2011. MethodsPatient demographics and characteristics of revision surgery were retrospectively extracted from a centralized database. Analyses of overall and cumulative rates were performed. ResultsDuring the study period, 2,827 primary cochlear implantations were performed in 2,311 patients, with 201 primary implants in 191 patients of this cohort (109 children and 82 adults) undergoing 235 revision surgeries. The most common indication for revision surgery was device failure (57.8%), followed by migration/extrusion (23.4%), infection/wound complication (17.0%), and poor outcome/secondary pathology (6.4%). The majority of revision surgeries were reimplantations. Overall revision and device failure rates were 8.3% and 4.8%, respectively. The cumulative revision rate for primary implants at all ages increased linearly by 1% per year. The cumulative revision rate was significantly higher in children, and decreased with more recently performed implantations and with newer generations of implants. ConclusionsThe cumulative revision rate for primary implants suggests an ongoing linear relationship between the time of postprimary implantation and the need for revision surgery. We have formed an evidence base that characterizes the nature and frequency of revision surgery in a high-volume setting, allowing clinicians to effectively counsel prospective patients and clinics to understand the burden of revision surgery and device failure. Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope 124:2393-2399, 2014
引用
收藏
页码:2393 / 2399
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Revision Cochlear Implant Surgery in Children: The Johns Hopkins Experience
    Marlowe, Andrea L.
    Chinnici, Jill E.
    Rivas, Alejandro
    Niparko, John K.
    Francis, Howard W.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (01) : 74 - 82
  • [2] Cochlear Implant Reliability: On the Reporting of Rates of Revision Surgery
    O'Neill, Graham
    Tolley, Neil S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2020, 72 (02) : 257 - 266
  • [3] Cochlear Implant Failure, Revision, and Reimplantation
    Sunde, Jumin
    Webb, Julia B.
    Moore, Page C.
    Gluth, Michael B.
    Dornhoffer, John L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (09) : 1670 - 1674
  • [4] Cochlear Implant Failure and Revision Surgery in Pediatric Population
    Blanchard, Marion
    Thierry, Briac
    Glynn, Fergal
    De Lamaze, Aude
    Garabedian, Erea Noel
    Loundon, Natalie
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 124 (03) : 227 - 231
  • [5] A retrospective review of cochlear implant revision surgery: a 24-year experience in China
    Chen, Jingyuan
    Chen, Biao
    Shi, Ying
    Li, Yongxin
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 279 (03) : 1211 - 1220
  • [6] Is Hard Failure Still a Common Indication for Revision Surgery in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients?
    Stevens, Shawn M.
    Dougherty, Hayden
    Wenstrup, Lisa
    Hammer, Theresa
    Cole, Tyler
    Redmann, Andrew
    Pensak, Myles L.
    Samy, Ravi N.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2019, 40 (03) : 321 - 327
  • [7] Cochlear implant failures and reimplantation: A 30-year analysis and literature review
    Lane, Ciaran
    Zimmerman, Kim
    Agrawal, Sumit
    Parnes, Lorne
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (03) : 782 - 789
  • [8] Incidence and Indications for Revision Cochlear Implant Surgery in Adults and Children
    Brown, Kevin D.
    Connell, Sarah S.
    Balkany, Thomas J.
    Eshraghi, Adrien E.
    Telischi, Fred F.
    Angeli, Simon A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2009, 119 (01) : 152 - 157
  • [9] Revision cochlear implant surgery in adult patients with suspected device malfunction
    Buchman, CA
    Higgins, CA
    Cullen, R
    Pillsbury, HC
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2004, 25 (04) : 504 - 510
  • [10] A clinical profile of revision cochlear implant surgery: MERF experience
    Rayamajhi, Pabina
    Kurkure, Rahul
    Castellino, Ashish
    Kumar, Santhosh
    Manjunath, H. A.
    Nandhan, Raghu
    Kameswaran, Mohan
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 22 (02) : 61 - 67