Barriers and facilitators towards colonoscopy: a qualitative systematic review

被引:13
作者
Lim, Kia Teng [1 ]
Ng, Cheng Han [1 ]
Decruz, Glenn Moses [1 ]
Lim, Tian Zhi [2 ]
Devi, Kamala [3 ]
Tan, Ker-Kan [2 ]
Chong, Choon Seng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Colorectal Surg, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Alice Lee Ctr Nursing Studies, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
colonoscopy; colorectal neoplasms; endoscopy; gastrointestinal neoplasms; intestinal neoplasms; neoplasms; qualitative research; CT COLONOGRAPHY; SCREENING COLONOSCOPY; PATIENT EXPERIENCES; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CANCER; AFRICAN; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000615
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives Colonoscopy is integral in the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), be it for screening, diagnostic or therapeutic intentions. Despite the presence of multiple screening modalities, colonoscopy remains integral in providing a definitive CRC diagnosis. However, uptake rates remain low worldwide with minimal understanding towards stakeholders' perspectives. This systematic review is the first to outline the barriers and facilitators faced by providers and patients in receiving colonoscopy specifically. Methods Using PRISMA guidelines, our systematic review consolidates findings from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science Core collection. All perceptions of healthcare providers and screening participants aged 45 and above towards colonoscopy were included. Results Forty-five articles were included in our review. Five major analytical themes were identified - procedural perceptions, personal experiences, thoughts and concerns, societal influences, doctor-patient relationship and healthcare system. The discrepancies in knowledge between patients and providers have evidently reduced in the present decade, potentially attributable to the rising influence of social media. The sharing of providers' personal experiences, involvement of patients' family in colonoscopy recommendations and propagation of patients' positive recounts were also more apparent in the past compared to the present decade, highlighting the need to reevaluate the balance between medical confidentiality and personal touch. Additionally, Asian patients were reportedly more apathetic towards CRC diagnosis due to their strong belief in destiny, a crucial association consistent with present studies. Conclusion This study highlights pertinent gaps in our healthcare system, providing crucial groundwork for interventions to be enacted in engendering higher colonoscopy uptake rates.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 238
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Impact of Screening Colonoscopy on Outcomes in Colon Cancer Surgery [J].
Amri, Ramzi ;
Bordeianou, Liliana G. ;
Sylla, Patricia ;
Berger, David L. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2013, 148 (08) :747-754
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Cancer Facts Figures 2019, on American Cancer society
[3]   Identifying Communication Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence among Appalachian Kentuckians [J].
Bachman, Audrey Smith ;
Cohen, Elisia L. ;
Collins, Tom ;
Hatcher, Jennifer ;
Crosby, Richard ;
Vanderpool, Robin C. .
HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2018, 33 (10) :1284-1292
[4]   Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Urban African American Clinic Patients: Differences by Gender and Screening Status [J].
Bass, Sarah Bauerle ;
Gordon, Thomas F. ;
Ruzek, Sheryl Burt ;
Wolak, Caitlin ;
Ward, Stephanie ;
Paranjape, Anuradha ;
Lin, Karen ;
Meyer, Brian ;
Ruggieri, Dominique G. .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2011, 26 (01) :121-128
[5]   Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study [J].
Bie, Anne Katrine Lykke ;
Brodersen, John .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2018, 36 (03) :262-271
[6]   Patient attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing for haemoglobin as an alternative to colonoscopic surveillance of groups at increased risk of colorectal cancer [J].
Bowyer, Harriet L. ;
Vart, Gemma ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
Atkin, Wendy ;
Halloran, Stephen P. ;
Seaman, Helen ;
Wardle, Jane ;
von Wagner, Christian .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2013, 20 (03) :149-156
[7]   Family Support and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Urban African Americans [J].
Brittain, Kelly ;
Taylor, Jacquelyn ;
Loveland-Cherry, Carol ;
Northouse, Laurel ;
Caldwell, Cleopatra H. .
JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2012, 8 (07) :522-+
[8]   Older Adult Perspectives Toward Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Study [J].
Calderwood, Audrey H. ;
Cazares, Kathy ;
O'Connor, Sharon .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 54 (01) :70-75
[9]   Colonoscopy and Sigmoidoscopy Use among the Average-Risk Population for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Trend Analysis [J].
Cardoso, Rafael ;
Niedermaier, Tobias ;
Chen, Chen ;
Hoffmeister, Michael ;
Brenner, Hermann .
CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (09) :617-629
[10]   What affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): A qualitative study [J].
Chapple, Alison ;
Ziebland, Sue ;
Hewitson, Paul ;
McPherson, Ann .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 66 (12) :2425-2435