Modeling and optimization of material removal rate and surface roughness for Al6010 HMMCs on WEDM using Response Surface Methodology

被引:10
作者
Kumar, Mukesh [1 ]
Tamang, S. K. [1 ]
Devi, Dipika [2 ]
Dabi, M. [1 ]
Prasad, K. K. [1 ,3 ]
Thirumalai, R. [4 ]
机构
[1] North Eastern Reg Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Nirjuli 791109, Arunachal, India
[2] North Eastern Reg Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Nirjuli 791109, Arunachal, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Ctr Sensor Instrumentat & Cyber Phys Syst Engn Se, New Delhi 110016, India
[4] Dr NGP Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Coimbatore 641048, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
JOURNAL OF CERAMIC PROCESSING RESEARCH | 2022年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
Hybrid metal matrix composite; WEDM; RSM; Surface quality; ANOVA; PARAMETRIC OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.36410/jcpr.2022.23.3.373
中图分类号
TQ174 [陶瓷工业]; TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
A Hybrid metal matrix composite (HMMCs) material has gained a lot of interest among industries due to its superior properties. Some of these properties are light in weight, high strength & rigidity, and high-temperature resistance. However, due to poor machinability, faster tool wear, machining of such materials exhibits greater challenges. The WEDM of aluminumbased HMMC Al6010 (10% SiC and 15% Al2O3) is investigated. The input variable viz., pulse on time (Ton), pulse of time (Toff), peak current (I) and servo voltage (V) of the WEDM process was modelled using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The investigation was carried out through varying their effect on the material removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness (Ra). Using desirability analysis an attempt has been made to optimize the multiple responses simultaneously, the MRR and Ra were optimized for desirability and optimum result found as R-a = 1.58 mu m and MRR = 18.31 mm(3)/min corresponding to V = 33.32 volt, Ton = 117.45 mu s, T-off = 45.041 mu s and I = 219.70 A. In addition, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) is performed to determine the significance of the selected input variable. It has been found that as peak current increases, MRR increases and Ra decreases. The RSM model's validity and appropriateness are confirmed by the test results.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 382
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Multi-response Optimization of WEDM Parameters Using an Integrated Approach of RSM–GRA Analysis for Pure Titanium
    Chaudhari R.
    Vora J.
    Parikh D.M.
    Wankhede V.
    Khanna S.
    [J]. Vora, Jay (vorajaykumar@gmail.com), 1600, Springer (101): : 117 - 126
  • [2] Chaudhary A., MATER TODAY-PROC, V50, P917
  • [3] Process parameters and properties of electric resistance spot welded AISI304-AISI1020 dissimilar weldments
    Kannaiyan, Mathi
    Raghuvaran, Jinn GowthamiThankachi
    Govindan, Karthikeyan
    Annamalai, Elaya Perumal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CERAMIC PROCESSING RESEARCH, 2020, 21 (01): : 26 - 34
  • [4] Karthik R., 2021, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V1013, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/1013/1/012005
  • [5] Investigating the influence of WEDM process parameters in machining of hybrid aluminum composites
    Kumar, Amresh
    Grover, Neelkant
    Manna, Alakesh
    Chohan, Jasgurpreet Singh
    Kumar, Raman
    Singh, Sunpreet
    Prakash, Chander
    Pruncu, Catalin Iulian
    [J]. ADVANCED COMPOSITES LETTERS, 2020, 29
  • [6] Parametric optimization of wire electrical discharge machining on aluminium based composites through grey relational analysis
    Kumar, S. Suresh
    Uthayakumar, M.
    Kumaran, S. Thirumalai
    Parameswaran, P.
    Mohandas, E.
    Kempulraj, G.
    Babu, B. S. Ramesh
    Natarajan, S. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2015, 20 : 33 - 39
  • [7] Kumar SS., 2020, Int J Light Mater Manuf, V3, P127, DOI [10.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.09.003, DOI 10.1016/J.IJLMM.2019.09.003]
  • [8] NRaju B., 2015, INT J ENG TRENDS TEC, V23, P82
  • [10] Multi objective optimization of wear characteristics on Al 7075/Al2O3/B4C composites - Desirability approach
    Pridhar, T.
    Ravikumar, K.
    Sureshbabu, B.
    Srinivasan, R.
    Sathishkumar, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CERAMIC PROCESSING RESEARCH, 2020, 21 (02): : 131 - 142