Recurrent renal cell carcinoma: clinical and prognostic value of FDG PET/CT

被引:61
作者
Alongi, Pierpaolo [1 ]
Picchio, Maria [1 ]
Zattoni, Fabio [2 ]
Spallino, Marianna [3 ]
Gianolli, Luigi [1 ]
Saladini, Giorgio [4 ]
Evangelista, Laura [4 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Nucl Med, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Oncol & Surg Sci, Urol Clin, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
[4] Veneto Inst Oncol IOV IRCCS, Radiotherapy & Nucl Med Unit, Gattamelata St 64, Padua, Italy
关键词
Renal cell carcinoma; FDGPET/CT; Prognosis; Recurrence; Multivariate analysis; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; GUIDELINES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-015-3159-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of our study was 1) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), 2) to assess the impact of FDG PET/CT on treatment decision-making, and 3) to estimate the prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in the restaging process among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods From the FDG PET/CT databases of San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy, and the Veneto Institute of Oncology in Padua, Italy, we selected 104 patients with a certain diagnosis of RCC after surgery, and for whom at least 24 months of post-surgical FDG PET/CT, clinical, and instrumental follow-up data was available. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET/CT were assessed by histology and/or other imaging as standard of reference. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of outcome. Results FDG PET/CT resulted in a positive diagnosis in 58 patients and a negative diagnosis in 46 patients. Sensitivity and specificity were 74 % and 80 %, respectively. FDG PET/CT findings influenced therapeutic management in 45/104 cases (43 %). After a median follow-up period of 37 months (+/- standard deviation 12.9), 51 (49 %) patients had recurrence of disease, and 26 (25 %) had died. In analysis of OS, positive versus negative FDG PET/CT was associated with worse cumulative survival rates over a 5-year period (19 % vs. 69 %, respectively; p < 0.05). Similarly, a positive FDG PET/CT correlated with a lower 3-year PFS rate. In addition, univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that a positive scan, alone or in combination with disease stage III-IV or nuclear grading 3-4, was associated with high risk of progression (multivariate analysis = hazard ratios [HRs] of 4.01, 3.7, and 2.8, respectively; all p < 0.05). Conclusions FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool both in treatment decision-making and for predicting survival and progression in patients affected by RCC.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 473
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Efficiency of [18F]FDG PET in characterising renal cancer and detecting distant metastases:: a comparison with CT [J].
Aide, N ;
Cappele, O ;
Bottet, P ;
Bensadoun, H ;
Regeasse, A ;
Comoz, F ;
Sobrio, F ;
Bouvard, G ;
Agostini, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (09) :1236-1245
[2]   Role of F18-FDG-PET/CT in restaging patients affected by renal carcinoma [J].
Bertagna, Francesco ;
Motta, Federica ;
Bertoli, Mattia ;
Bosio, Giovanni ;
Fisogni, Simona ;
Tardanico, Regina ;
Ferrari, Vittorio ;
Antonelli, Alessandro ;
Simeone, Claudio ;
Cunico, Sergio Cosciani ;
Giubbini, Raffaele .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW, 2013, 16 (01) :3-8
[3]   FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 [J].
Boellaard, Ronald ;
O'Doherty, Mike J. ;
Weber, Wolfgang A. ;
Mottaghy, Felix M. ;
Lonsdale, Markus N. ;
Stroobants, Sigrid G. ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
Kotzerke, Joerg ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Pruim, Jan ;
Marsden, Paul K. ;
Tatsch, Klaus ;
Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;
Visser, Eric P. ;
Arends, Bertjan ;
Verzijlbergen, Fred J. ;
Zijlstra, Josee M. ;
Comans, Emile F. I. ;
Lammertsma, Adriaan A. ;
Paans, Anne M. ;
Willemsen, Antoon T. ;
Beyer, Thomas ;
Bockisch, Andreas ;
Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia ;
Delbeke, Dominique ;
Baum, Richard P. ;
Chiti, Arturo ;
Krause, Bernd J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (01) :181-200
[4]   The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM [J].
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) :1471-1474
[5]   Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up [J].
Escudier, B. ;
Porta, C. ;
Schmidinger, M. ;
Algaba, F. ;
Patard, J. J. ;
Khoo, V. ;
Eisen, T. ;
Horwich, A. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 :49-56
[6]   Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006 [J].
Ferlay, J. ;
Autier, P. ;
Boniol, M. ;
Heanue, M. ;
Colombet, M. ;
Boyle, P. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (03) :581-592
[7]  
Fuccio C, 2014, CLIN NUCL MED, V39, pE320, DOI 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000382
[8]   Clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography for detection of renal cell carcinoma [J].
Kang, DE ;
White, RL ;
Zuger, JH ;
Sasser, HC ;
Teigland, CM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (05) :1806-1809
[9]   Prediction of progression after radical nephrectomy for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma - A stratification tool for prospective clinical trials [J].
Leibovich, BC ;
Blute, ML ;
Cheville, JC ;
Lohse, CM ;
Frank, I ;
Kwon, ED ;
Weaver, AL ;
Parker, AS ;
Zincke, H .
CANCER, 2003, 97 (07) :1663-1671
[10]   EAU Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2014 Update [J].
Ljungberg, Borje ;
Bensalah, Karim ;
Canfield, Steven ;
Dabestani, Saeed ;
Hofmann, Fabian ;
Hora, Milan ;
Kuczyk, Markus A. ;
Lam, Thomas ;
Marconi, Lorenzo ;
Merseburger, Axel S. ;
Mulders, Peter ;
Powles, Thomas ;
Staehler, Michael ;
Volpe, Alessandro ;
Bex, Axel .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (05) :913-924