Effect of Eudragit S100 nanoparticles and alginate chitosan encapsulation on the viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus

被引:56
作者
Ansari, Fereshteh [1 ]
Pourjafar, Hadi [2 ]
Jodat, Vahid [3 ]
Sahebi, Javad [3 ]
Ataei, Amir [3 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Res Ctr Evidence Based Med, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Maragheh Univ Med Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Maragheh, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Encapsulation; Lactobacillus acidophilus; Lactobacillus rhamnosus; Viability; Chitosan; Eudragit S100 nanoparticles; SIMULATED GASTROINTESTINAL CONDITIONS; PROBIOTIC BACTERIA; TARGETED DELIVERY; CALCIUM ALGINATE; SURVIVAL; MICROENCAPSULATION; BEADS; YOGURT; STARCH; DRUG;
D O I
10.1186/s13568-017-0442-x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In this study, we examined a novel method of microencapsulation with calcium alginate-chitosan and Eudragit S100 nanoparticles for the improving viability of probiotic bacteria, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Extrusion technique was carried out in microencapsulation process. The viability of two probiotics in single coated beads (with only chitosan), double coated beads (with chitosan and Eudragit nanoparticles), and as free cells (unencapsulated) were conducted in simulated gastric juice (pH 1.55, without pepsin) followed by incubation in simulated intestinal juice (pH 7.5, with 1% bile salt). In case of single coated beads, presumably, lack of sufficient strength of chitosan under simulated gastric condition was the main reason of 4-log and 5-log reduction of the counts of the L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus respectively. The results showed that with the second coat forming (Eudragit nanoparticles) over the first coat (chitosan), the strength of the beads and then viability rate of the bacteria were increased in comparison with the single coated beads.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery [J].
Anal, Anil Kumar ;
Singh, Harjinder .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 18 (05) :240-251
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J VET RES, DOI DOI 10.22059/JVR.2016.58729
[3]  
Badhana S., 2013, International Current Pharmaceutical Journal, V2, P42, DOI [10.3329/icpj.v2i3.13577, DOI 10.3329/ICPJ.V2I3.13577]
[4]   Interaction and complex formation between catalase and cationic polyelectrolytes: Chitosan and Eudragit E100 [J].
Boeris, Valeria ;
Romanini, Diana ;
Farruggia, Beatriz ;
Pico, Guillemo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2009, 45 (02) :103-108
[5]  
El Nabarawi, 2016, INT J PHARM PHARM SC, V8, P206, DOI DOI 10.22159/IJPPS.2016.V8I9.12999
[6]  
Ghorbani-Choboghlo H, 2015, IRAN J MICROBIOL, V7, P338
[7]   Comparison of the efficacy and safety of Eudragit-L-coated mesalazine tablets with ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine tablets in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis [J].
Gibson, PR ;
Fixa, B ;
Pekárková, B ;
Bátovsky, M ;
Radford-Smith, G ;
Tibitanzl, J ;
Gabalec, L ;
Florin, THJ ;
Greinwald, R .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 23 (07) :1017-1026
[8]   The effect of drug and EUDRAGIT® S 100 miscibility in solid dispersions on the drug and polymer dissolution rate [J].
Higashi, Kenjirou ;
Hayashi, Hiroki ;
Yamamoto, Keiji ;
Moribe, Kunikazu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2015, 494 (01) :9-16
[9]   A Novel Preparation Method for 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Loaded Eudragit S100 Nanoparticles [J].
Hu, Daode ;
Liu, Liang ;
Chen, Wenjuan ;
Li, Sining ;
Zhao, Yaping .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2012, 13 (05) :6454-6468
[10]  
Jose M. G., 2006, IMMOBILIZATION ENZYM