Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood

被引:35
作者
Mirrett, S
Reller, LB
Petti, CA
Woods, CW
Vazirani, B
Sivadas, R
Weinstein, MP
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Clin Microbiol Lab, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Robert Wood Johnson Univ Hosp, Microbiol Lab, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[5] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Med, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[6] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Pathol, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.41.6.2391-2394.2003
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Standard aerobic media are widely used for culturing blood with the BacT/ALERT (BioMerieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.) (BM) and BACTEC 9240 (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Md.) (BD) automated continuously monitoring instrument systems. Although similarly composed of soybean-casein digest broths, the formulations of the standard aerobic media available for these instruments differ from each other in supplements and in sodium polyanethole-sulfonate concentration. Therefore, we compared the standard aerobic media available for these systems at two university hospitals. Blood samples from adult patients with suspected bloodstream infection were inoculated at the bedside into nonvented BM and BD standard aerobic blood culture bottles and incubated in their respective instruments. The laboratories received 6,743 pairs of bottles that were each filled with 8 to 12 ml of blood. A total of 523 isolates representing true infections were recovered from 257 patients; of these isolates, 348 were recovered from both the BD and the BM bottles, 108 were recovered from the BM bottles only, and 67 were recovered from the BD bottles only (P < 0.005). More staphylococci (P < 0.05), especially coagulase-negative staphylococci (P < 0.05), and yeasts (P < 0.01) were recovered from BM bottles than from BD bottles. Of 291 unimicrobial episodes of bloodstream infection, 220 were detected with both bottles, 41 were detected with the BM bottles only, and 30 were detected with the BD bottles only (difference not significant). Among 335 cultures that were positive in both bottles within the first 72 h of incubation, the median times to detection were 14 h for BM bottles and 13 h for BD bottles. Rates for false-positive results were 0.5% for BM bottles and 0.1% for BD bottles. One BM bottle and seven BD bottles yielded false-negative results. We conclude that the BM medium provides improved recovery of microorganisms, especially staphylococci and yeasts, compared with that provided by the BD medium.
引用
收藏
页码:2391 / 2394
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   CLINICAL COMPARISON OF THE ISOLATOR AND BACT/ALERT AEROBIC BLOOD CULTURE SYSTEMS [J].
HELLINGER, WC ;
CAWLEY, JJ ;
ALVAREZ, S ;
HOGAN, SF ;
HARMSEN, WS ;
ILSTRUP, DM ;
COCKERILL, FR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (07) :1787-1790
[2]  
McNemar Q., 1969, Psychological statistics, V4th ed
[3]  
Murray PR., 1995, MANUAL CLIN MICROBIO
[4]  
NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards), 2002, PERF STAND ANT SUSC
[5]  
Weinstein MP, 1997, CLIN INFECT DIS, V24, P584, DOI 10.1093/clind/24.4.584
[6]   CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF 5-MILLILITERS VERSUS 10-MILLILITERS OF BLOOD CULTURED IN AEROBIC BACT/ALERT BLOOD CULTURE BOTTLES [J].
WEINSTEIN, MP ;
MIRRETT, S ;
WILSON, ML ;
REIMER, LG ;
RELLER, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (09) :2103-2106
[7]   CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF BACT ALERT STANDARD AEROBIC AND FAN AEROBIC BLOOD CULTURE BOTTLES FOR DETECTION OF BACTEREMIA AND FUNGEMIA [J].
WEINSTEIN, MP ;
MIRRETT, S ;
REIMER, LG ;
WILSON, ML ;
SMITHELEKES, S ;
CHUARD, CR ;
JOHO, KL ;
RELLER, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (04) :978-981
[8]   THE CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE BLOOD CULTURES - A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF 500 EPISODES OF BACTEREMIA AND FUNGEMIA IN ADULTS .1. LABORATORY AND EPIDEMIOLOGIC OBSERVATIONS [J].
WEINSTEIN, MP ;
RELLER, LB ;
MURPHY, JR ;
LICHTENSTEIN, KA .
REVIEWS OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1983, 5 (01) :35-53
[9]   CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF THE BACT ALERT AND BACTEC-660/730 NONRADIOMETRIC BLOOD CULTURE SYSTEMS [J].
WILSON, ML ;
WEINSTEIN, MP ;
REIMER, LG ;
MIRRETT, S ;
RELLER, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (02) :323-329
[10]   COMPARISON OF DIFCO ESP AND ORGANON-TEKNIKA BACT/ALERT CONTINUOUS-MONITORING BLOOD CULTURE SYSTEMS [J].
ZWADYK, P ;
PIERSON, CL ;
YOUNG, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (05) :1273-1279