Development and evaluation of a virtual knowledge assessment tool for transanal total mesorectal excision

被引:0
作者
Naghawi, Hamzeh [1 ]
Chau, Johnny [1 ]
Madani, Amin [2 ]
Kaneva, Pepa [1 ]
Monson, John [3 ]
Mueller, Carmen [1 ]
Lee, Lawrence [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Steinberg Bernstein Ctr Minimally Invas Surg, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Gen Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Advent Hlth Med Grp, Orlando, FL USA
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Surg, Colon & Rectal Surg, Ctr Hlth, 1001 Decarie Blvd,DS1-3310, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
关键词
Transanal total mesorectal excision; Learning curve; Proficiency; Assessment; LAPAROSCOPIC-ASSISTED RESECTION; RECTAL-CANCER; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; VALIDITY EVIDENCE; DECISION-MAKING; CONSENSUS; EXPERIENCE; TATME;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-022-02621-0
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Transanal total mesorectal excision (TATME) is difficult to learn and can result in serious complications. Current paradigms for assessing performance and competency may be insufficient. This study aims to develop and provide preliminary validity evidence for a TATME virtual assessment tool (TATME-VAT) to assess the cognitive skills necessary to safely complete TATME dissection. Methods Participants from North America, Europe, Japan and China completed the test via an interactive online platform between 11/2019 and 05/2020. They were grouped into expert, experienced and novice surgeons depending on the number of independently performed TATMEs. TATME-VAT is a 24-item web-based assessment evaluating advanced cognitive skills, designed according to a blueprint from consensus guidelines. Eight items were multiple choice questions. Sixteen items required making annotations on still frames of TATME videos (VCT) and were scored using a validated algorithm derived from experts' responses. Annotation (range 0-100), multiple choice (range 0-100), and overall scores (sum of annotation and multiple-choice scores, normalized to mu = 50 and sigma = 10) were reported. Results There were significant differences between the expert, experienced, and novice groups for the annotation (p <0.001), multiple-choice (p < 0.001), and overall scores (p < 0.001). The annotation (p = 0.439) and overall (p = 0.152) scores were similar between the experienced and novice groups. Annotation scores were higher in participants with 51 or more vs. 30-50 vs. less than 30 cases. Scores were also lower in users with a self-reported recent complication vs. those without. Conclusions This study describes the development of an interactive video-based virtual assessment tool for TATME dissection and provides initial validity evidence for its use.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 560
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision
    Adamina, Michel
    Buchs, Nicolas C.
    Penna, Marta
    Hompes, Roel
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (03): : 1091 - 1103
  • [2] Expertise-based design in surgical trials: a narrative review
    Alsagheir, Ali
    Koziarz, Alex
    Belley-Cote, Emilie P.
    Whitlock, Richard P.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 64 (06) : E594 - E602
  • [3] P338: summarizing measures of proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision-a systematic review
    Antoun, Alen
    Chau, Johnny
    Alsharqawi, Nourah
    Kaneva, Pepa
    Feldman, Liane S.
    Mueller, Carmen L.
    Lee, Lawrence
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (08): : 4817 - 4824
  • [4] Critical concepts and important anatomic landmarks encountered during transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): toward the mastery of a new operation for rectal cancer surgery
    Atallah, S.
    Albert, M.
    Monson, J. R. T.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2016, 20 (07) : 483 - 494
  • [5] Uptake of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in North America: Initial Assessment of a Structured Training Program and the Experience of Delegate Surgeons
    Atallah, Sam B.
    DuBose, Arielle C.
    Burke, John P.
    Nassif, George
    deBeche-Adams, Teresa
    Frering, Taylor
    Albert, Matthew R.
    Monson, John R. T.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (10) : 1023 - 1031
  • [6] Surveys in Surgical Education: A Systematic Review and Reporting Guideline
    Banning, Louise B. D.
    Meyer, Vincent M.
    Keupers, Joost
    Lange, Johan F. M.
    Pol, Robert A.
    Benjamens, Stan
    [J]. EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 62 (02) : 61 - 67
  • [7] Surgical Skill and Complication Rates after Bariatric Surgery
    Birkmeyer, John D.
    Finks, Jonathan F.
    O'Reilly, Amanda
    Oerline, Mary
    Carlin, Arthur M.
    Nunn, Andre R.
    Dimick, Justin
    Banerjee, Mousumi
    Birkmeyer, Nancy J. O.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (15) : 1434 - 1442
  • [8] Association Between Surgical Technical Skill and Long-term Survival for Colon Cancer
    Brajcich, Brian C.
    Stulberg, Jonah J.
    Palis, Bryan E.
    Chung, Jeanette W.
    Huang, Reiping
    Nelson, Heidi
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2021, 7 (01) : 127 - 129
  • [9] Experience beyond the learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) and its effect on the incidence of anastomotic leak
    Caycedo-Marulanda, A.
    Verschoor, C. P.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (04) : 309 - 316
  • [10] Association of Surgical Skill Assessment With Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Surgery
    Curtis, Nathan J.
    Foster, Jake D.
    Miskovic, Danilo
    Brown, Chris S. B.
    Hewett, Peter J.
    Abbott, Sarah
    Hanna, George B.
    Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
    Francis, Nader K.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (07) : 590 - 598