Comparison of two inverse analysis techniques for learning deep excavation response

被引:84
作者
Hashash, Youssef M. A. [1 ]
Levasseur, Severine [2 ]
Osouli, Abdolreza [1 ]
Finno, Richard [3 ]
Malecot, Yann [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Liege, Natl Fdn Sci Res Belgium, Dept ArGEnCo Geomech & Geol Engn, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Univ Grenoble 1, Lab Sols Solides Struct Risques, F-38041 Grenoble 9, France
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Excavation; Inverse analysis; Optimization; Soil behavior; Neural network material models; GENETIC ALGORITHM; BACK ANALYSIS; PARAMETERS; IDENTIFICATION; INTEGRATION; TUNNEL; MODEL; CLAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.11.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Performance observation is a necessary part of the design and construction process in geotechnical engineering. For deep urban excavations, empirical and numerical methods are used to predict potential deformations and their impacts on surrounding structures. Two inverse analysis approaches are described and compared for an excavation project in downtown Chicago. The first approach is a parameter optimization approach based on genetic algorithm (GA). GA is a stochastic global search technique for optimizing an objective function with linear or non-linear constraints. The second approach, self-learning simulations (SelfSim), is an inverse analysis technique that combines finite element method, continuously evolving material models, and field measurements. The optimization based on genetic algorithm approach identifies material properties of an existing soil model, and SelfSim approach extracts the underlying soil behavior unconstrained by a specific assumption on soil constitutive behavior. The two inverse analysis approaches capture well lateral wall deflections and maximum surface settlements. The GA optimization approach tends to overpredict surface settlements at some distance from the excavation as it is constrained by a specific form of the material constitutive model (i.e. hardening soil model); while the surface settlements computed using SelfSim approach match the observed ones due to its ability to learn small strain non-linearity of soil implied in the measured settlements. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 333
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Three-dimensional responses of a tied-back excavation through clay [J].
Finno, RJ ;
Roboski, JF .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (03) :273-282
[12]  
FU Q, 2007, GEODENVER 2007
[13]   Integration of laboratory testing and constitutive modeling of soils [J].
Fu, Qingwei ;
Hashash, Youssef M. A. ;
Jung, Sungmoon ;
Ghaboussi, Jarnshid .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2007, 34 (05) :330-345
[14]   Estimation of parameters in geotechnical backanalysis .2. Application to a tunnel excavation problem [J].
Gens, A ;
Ledesma, A ;
Alonso, EE .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 1996, 18 (01) :29-46
[15]   KNOWLEDGE-BASED MODELING OF MATERIAL BEHAVIOR WITH NEURAL NETWORKS [J].
GHABOUSSI, J ;
GARRETT, JH ;
WU, X .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1991, 117 (01) :132-153
[16]   Biologically inspired soft computing methods in structural mechanics and engineering [J].
Ghaboussi, J .
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2001, 11 (05) :485-502
[17]  
Ghaboussi J, 1998, INT J NUMER METH ENG, V42, P105, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980515)42:1<105::AID-NME356>3.0.CO
[18]  
2-V
[19]  
GHABOUSSI J, 1997, 6 INT S NUM MOD GEOM
[20]  
Gioda G, 1999, INT J NUMER ANAL MET, V23, P1407, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199911)23:13<1407::AID-NAG934>3.0.CO