iOntoBioethics: A Framework for the Agile Development of Bioethics Ontologies in Pandemics, Applied to COVID-19

被引:3
作者
Odeh, Mohammed [1 ,2 ]
Kharbat, Faten F. [3 ]
Yousef, Rana [4 ]
Odeh, Yousra [5 ]
Tbaishat, Dina [6 ]
Hakooz, Nancy [7 ]
Dajani, Rana [8 ,9 ]
Mansour, Asem [1 ]
机构
[1] King Hussein Canc Ctr KHCC, Canc Care Informat Programme, Amman, Jordan
[2] Univ West England, Fac Environm & Technol, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Al Ain Univ, Software Engn & Comp Sci Dept, Coll Engn, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[4] Univ Jordan, King Abdullah II Sch Informat Technol KASIT, Comp Informat Syst Dept, Amman, Jordan
[5] Appl Sci Private Univ, Fac Informat Technol FIT, Software Engn Dept, Amman, Jordan
[6] Univ Jordan, Lib & Informat Sci Dept, Amman, Jordan
[7] Univ Jordan, Sch Pharm, Dept Biopharmaceut & Clin Pharm, Amman, Jordan
[8] Hashemite Univ, Dept Biol & Biotechnol, Zarqa, Jordan
[9] Univ Richmond, Jepson Sch Leadership, Richmond, VA 23173 USA
关键词
bioethics; COVID-19; pandemic; bioethics ontology; bioethics informatics; iOntoBioethics; agile framework; design science research methodology; DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY; ETHICS;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2021.619978
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Few ontological attempts have been reported for conceptualizing the bioethics domain. In addition to limited scope representativeness and lack of robust methodological approaches in driving research design and evaluation of bioethics ontologies, no bioethics ontologies exist for pandemics and COVID-19. This research attempted to investigate whether studying the bioethics research literature, from the inception of bioethics research publications, facilitates developing highly agile, and representative computational bioethics ontology as a foundation for the automatic governance of bioethics processes in general and the COVID-19 pandemic in particular. Research Design: The iOntoBioethics agile research framework adopted the Design Science Research Methodology. Using systematic literature mapping, the search space resulted in 26,170 Scopus indexed bioethics articles, published since 1971. iOntoBioethics underwent two distinctive stages: (1) Manually Constructing Bioethics (MCB) ontology from selected bioethics sources, and (2) Automatically generating bioethics ontological topic models with all 26,170 sources and using special-purpose developed Text Mining and Machine-Learning (TM&ML) engine. Bioethics domain experts validated these ontologies, and further extended to construct and validate the Bioethics COVID-19 Pandemic Ontology. Results: Cross-validation of the MCB and TM&ML bioethics ontologies confirmed that the latter provided higher-level abstraction for bioethics entities with well-structured bioethics ontology class hierarchy compared to the MCB ontology. However, both bioethics ontologies were found to complement each other forming a highly comprehensive Bioethics Ontology with around 700 concepts and associations COVID-19 inclusive. Conclusion: The iOntoBioethics framework yielded the first agile, semi-automatically generated, literature-based, and domain experts validated General Bioethics and Bioethics Pandemic Ontologies Operable in COVID-19 context with readiness for automatic governance of bioethics processes. These ontologies will be regularly and semi-automatically enriched as iOntoBioethics is proposed as an open platform for scientific and healthcare communities, in their infancy COVID-19 learning stage. iOntoBioethics not only it contributes to better understanding of bioethics processes, but also serves as a bridge linking these processes to healthcare systems. Such big data analytics platform has the potential to automatically inform bioethics governance adherence given the plethora of developing bioethics and COVID-19 pandemic knowledge. Finally, iOntoBioethics contributes toward setting the first building block for forming the field of "Bioethics Informatics".
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Aksoy Sahin, 2002, BMC Med Ethics, V3, pE4
[2]  
Altman DG., 2020, SCOPUS
[3]   Making research articles fit for purpose: structured reporting of key methods and findings [J].
Altman, Douglas G. .
TRIALS, 2015, 16
[4]   Design Science Research Contributions: Finding a Balance between Artifact and Theory [J].
Baskerville, Richard ;
Baiyere, Abayomi ;
Gregor, Shirley ;
Hevner, Alan ;
Rossi, Matti .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 19 (05) :358-376
[5]  
Beauchamp T.L., 2012, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA
[6]   Probabilistic Topic Models [J].
Blei, David M. .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2012, 55 (04) :77-84
[7]   Latent Dirichlet allocation [J].
Blei, DM ;
Ng, AY ;
Jordan, MI .
JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2003, 3 (4-5) :993-1022
[8]  
Cascais Fernando., 1997, Global Bioethics, V10, P9
[9]   How organizational context affects bioethical decision-making: Pharmacists' management of gatekeeping processes in retail and hospital settings [J].
Chiarello, Elizabeth .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 98 :319-329
[10]  
Dinov ID, 2018, DATA SCI PREDICTIVE, P659, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-72347-120, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72347-1_20]