NEMA NU2-2001 guided performance evaluation of four siemens ECAT PET scanners

被引:46
作者
Herzog, H [1 ]
Tellmann, L
Hocke, C
Pietrzyk, U
Casey, ME
Kuwert, T
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Juelich, Inst Med, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Clin Nucl Med, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[3] CPS Innovat, Knoxville, TN 37932 USA
关键词
NEMA-NU2; 2001; performance test; positron emission tomography (PET);
D O I
10.1109/TNS.2004.835778
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The NEMA NU 2-2001 protocol has been especially designed for the performance evaluation of whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) measurements with scanners acquiring data in three-dimensional (3-D) mode without septa or with septa retracted. We report on the comparative NEMA NU 2-2001 performance tests on four different Siemens/CTI ECAT PET scanners, the two bismuth germanate oxide scanners HR+ and EXACT and the two lutetium oxyorthosilicate scanners ACCEL and EMERGE. All scanners were operated in 3-D mode only. Until now, no complete NEMA NU 2-2001 evaluations have been reported for the HR+ and EXACT. For the ACCEL and the EMERGE, these are the first published performance characteristics as far as we know. The HR+ showed a superior spatial resolution, whereas the ACCEL had the best countrate [noise equivalent count (NEC)] performance above a radioactivity concentration of 2 kBq/cc. The sensitivity of the full-ring scanners did not differ much with numbers between 5982 and 7180 cps/MBq. The sensitivity of the partial-ring scanner EMERGE was 2279 cps/MBq. Although the EMERGE yields lower NEC rates than the EXACT for radioactivity concentrations less than 10 kBq/cc, it is favorable beyond this cross over point. The scatter fraction of all four scanners was about 48%. The lesions to be examined by the image quality test could be seen best with the ACCEL. The NEMA NU 2-2001 performance tests proved to be a valuable guideline for this instrumental comparison.
引用
收藏
页码:2662 / 2669
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR+ following the IEC standard [J].
Adam, LE ;
Zaers, J ;
Ostertag, H ;
Trojan, H ;
Bellemann, ME ;
Brix, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1997, 44 (03) :1172-1179
[2]   A METHOD FOR MEASURING THE ABSOLUTE SENSITIVITY OF POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHIC SCANNERS [J].
BAILEY, DL ;
JONES, T ;
SPINKS, TJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1991, 18 (06) :374-379
[3]  
Brix G, 1997, J NUCL MED, V38, P1614
[4]  
Daube-Witherspoon ME, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1398
[5]   3-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION FROM COMPLETE PROJECTIONS [J].
DEFRISE, M ;
TOWNSEND, DW ;
CLACK, R .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1989, 34 (05) :573-587
[6]  
ERIKSSON L, 2001, P IEEE CON MED IM SA
[7]  
Guzzardi R, 1991, J Nucl Biol Med, V35, P141
[8]   QUANTITATION IN POSITRON EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY .4. EFFECT OF ACCIDENTAL COINCIDENCES [J].
HOFFMAN, EJ ;
HUANG, SC ;
PHELPS, ME ;
KUHL, DE .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1981, 5 (03) :391-400
[9]  
*IEC, 1998, 616751 EC
[10]  
KARP JS, 1991, J NUCL MED, V32, P2342