Relation of Individual Time Management Practices and Time Management of Teams

被引:0
作者
Auvinen, Tapio [1 ]
Falkner, Nickolas [2 ]
Hellas, Arto [3 ]
Ihantola, Petri [4 ]
Karavirta, Ville
Seppala, Otto [3 ]
机构
[1] VXT Res, Espoo, Finland
[2] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Aalto Univ, Espoo, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
来源
2020 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2020) | 2020年
关键词
student project; time management; team configuration; PROCRASTINATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Team configuration, work practices, and communication have a considerable impact on the outcomes of student software projects. This study observes 150 college students who first individually solve exercises and then carry out a class project in teams of three. All projects had the same requirements. We analyzed how students' behavior on individual pre-project exercises predict team project outcomes, investigated how students' time management practices affected other team members, and analyzed how students divided their work among peers. Our results indicate that teams consisting of only low-performing students were the most dysfunctional in terms of workload balance, whereas teams with both low-and high-performing students performed almost as well as teams consisting of only high-performing students. This suggests that teams should combine students of varying skill levels rather than allowing teams with only low performers or letting students to form teams without constraints. We also observed that individual students' poor time management practices impair their teammates' time management. This underlines the importance of encouraging good time management practices. Most teams reported that they divided tasks in a way that is beneficial for the acquisition of technical skills rather than collaboration and communication skills. Only a few teams assigned tasks so that students would have worked only on tasks they already knew and thus felt most comfortable to work with.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]  
Clark N., 2005, Australasian conference on Computing education, P91
[12]  
Clear T., 2001, Working Group Reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, P93
[13]  
Cushing Judy, 2003, J. Comput. Sci. Coll., V19, P72
[14]  
Dickinson T.L., 1997, SER APPL PSYCHOL, P19
[15]   Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory [J].
Dowling, N. Maritza ;
Bolt, Daniel M. ;
Deng, Sien ;
Li, Chenxi .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2016, 16
[16]   Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology [J].
Dunlosky, John ;
Rawson, Katherine A. ;
Marsh, Elizabeth J. ;
Nathan, Mitchell J. ;
Willingham, Daniel T. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 2013, 14 (01) :4-58
[17]  
Dutson AJ., 1997, J ENG EDUC, V86, P17, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.2168-9830.1997.TB00260.X
[18]  
Edwards SH, 2009, FIFTH INTERNATIONAL COMPUTING EDUCATION RESEARCH WORKSHOP - ICER 2009, P3
[19]   Comparing Educational Experiences and On-the-Job Needs of Educational Software Designers [J].
Exter, Marisa .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION (SIGCSE'14), 2014, :355-360
[20]  
Fagerholm F, 2013, PROC FRONT EDUC CONF