Relation of Individual Time Management Practices and Time Management of Teams

被引:0
作者
Auvinen, Tapio [1 ]
Falkner, Nickolas [2 ]
Hellas, Arto [3 ]
Ihantola, Petri [4 ]
Karavirta, Ville
Seppala, Otto [3 ]
机构
[1] VXT Res, Espoo, Finland
[2] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Aalto Univ, Espoo, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
来源
2020 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2020) | 2020年
关键词
student project; time management; team configuration; PROCRASTINATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Team configuration, work practices, and communication have a considerable impact on the outcomes of student software projects. This study observes 150 college students who first individually solve exercises and then carry out a class project in teams of three. All projects had the same requirements. We analyzed how students' behavior on individual pre-project exercises predict team project outcomes, investigated how students' time management practices affected other team members, and analyzed how students divided their work among peers. Our results indicate that teams consisting of only low-performing students were the most dysfunctional in terms of workload balance, whereas teams with both low-and high-performing students performed almost as well as teams consisting of only high-performing students. This suggests that teams should combine students of varying skill levels rather than allowing teams with only low performers or letting students to form teams without constraints. We also observed that individual students' poor time management practices impair their teammates' time management. This underlines the importance of encouraging good time management practices. Most teams reported that they divided tasks in a way that is beneficial for the acquisition of technical skills rather than collaboration and communication skills. Only a few teams assigned tasks so that students would have worked only on tasks they already knew and thus felt most comfortable to work with.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
A. f. C. M. A. Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula and I. C. Society, 2013, COMPUTER SCI CURRICU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, Kristiansand, Norway, DOI DOI 10.1145/512360.512363
[3]  
Barker L. J., 2005, SIGCSE Bulletin, V37, P276, DOI 10.1145/1151954.1067521
[4]  
Begel A, 2008, SIGCSE'08: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, P226, DOI 10.1145/1352322.1352218
[5]  
Biggs J., 2009, Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does, V3rd
[6]   EFFECTS OF TIME-MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON COLLEGE GRADES [J].
BRITTON, BK ;
TESSER, A .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 83 (03) :405-410
[7]  
Brooks C.M., 2003, J EDUC BUS, V78, P268
[8]  
Buffardi Kevin, 2013, ICER 2013 P 2013 ACM, P83
[9]   Making Sense of Software Development and Personality Types [J].
Capretz, Luiz Fernando ;
Ahmed, Faheem .
IT PROFESSIONAL, 2010, 12 (01) :6-13
[10]   CAN'T WE PICK OUR OWN GROUPS? THE INFLUENCE OF GROUP SELECTION METHOD ON GROUP DYNAMICS AND OUTCOMES [J].
Chapman, Kenneth J. ;
Meuter, Matthew ;
Toy, Dan ;
Wright, Lauren .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2006, 30 (04) :557-569