Management of multimorbidity using a patient-centred care model: a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial of the 3D approach

被引:265
作者
Salisbury, Chris [1 ]
Man, Mei-See [1 ]
Bower, Peter [3 ]
Guthrie, Bruce [4 ]
Chaplin, Katherine [1 ]
Gaunt, Daisy M. [2 ]
Brookes, Sara [2 ]
Fitzpatrick, Bridie [5 ]
Gardner, Caroline [3 ]
Hollinghurst, Sandra [1 ]
Lee, Victoria [3 ]
McLeod, John [5 ]
Mann, Cindy [1 ]
Moffat, Keith R. [5 ]
Mercer, Stewart W. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Populat Hlth Sci, Ctr Acad Primary Care,NIHR Sch Primary Care Res, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol Randomised Trials Collaborat, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, NIHR Sch Primary Care Res, Ctr Primary Care,Div Populat Hlth Hlth Serv Res &, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Dundee, Sch Med, Populat Hlth Sci Div, Dundee, Scotland
[5] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
EDUCATION; HEALTH; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31308-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The management of people with multiple chronic conditions challenges health-care systems designed around single conditions. There is international consensus that care for multimorbidity should be patient-centred, focus on quality of life, and promote self-management towards agreed goals. However, there is little evidence about the effectiveness of this approach. Our hypothesis was that the patient-centred, so-called 3D approach (based on dimensions of health, depression, and drugs) for patients with multimorbidity would improve their health-related quality of life, which is the ultimate aim of the 3D intervention. Methods We did this pragmatic cluster-randomised trial in general practices in England and Scotland. Practices were randomly allocated to continue usual care (17 practices) or to provide 6-monthly comprehensive 3D reviews, incorporating patient-centred strategies that reflected international consensus on best care (16 practices). Randomisation was computer-generated, stratified by area, and minimised by practice deprivation and list size. Adults with three or more chronic conditions were recruited. The primary outcome was quality of life (assessed with EQ-5D-5L) after 15 months' follow-up. Participants were not masked to group assignment, but analysis of outcomes was blinded. We analysed the primary outcome in the intention-to-treat population, with missing data being multiply imputed. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN06180958. Findings Between May 20, 2015, and Dec 31, 2015, we recruited 1546 patients from 33 practices and randomly assigned them to receive the intervention (n=797) or usual care (n=749). In our intention-to-treat analysis, there was no difference between trial groups in the primary outcome of quality of life (adjusted difference in mean EQ-5D-5L 0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02; p=0 . 93). 78 patients died, and the deaths were not considered as related to the intervention. Interpretation To our knowledge, this trial is the largest investigation of the international consensus about optimal management of multimorbidity. The 3D intervention did not improve patients' quality of life.& nbsp;
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 50
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method 3rd edition
[2]   Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study [J].
Barnett, Karen ;
Mercer, Stewart W. ;
Norbury, Michael ;
Watt, Graham ;
Wyke, Sally ;
Guthrie, Bruce .
LANCET, 2012, 380 (9836) :37-43
[3]   Processes of care desired by elderly patients with multimorbidities [J].
Bayliss, Elizabeth A. ;
Edwards, Allison E. ;
Steiner, John F. ;
Main, Deborah S. .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 25 (04) :287-293
[4]   Seniors' self-reported multimorbidity captured biopsychosocial factors not incorporated into two other data-based morbidity measures [J].
Bayliss, Elizabeth A. ;
Ellis, Jennifer L. ;
Steiner, John F. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (05) :550-557
[5]   The Triple Aim: Care, health, and cost [J].
Berwick, Donald M. ;
Nolan, Thomas W. ;
Whittington, John .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2008, 27 (03) :759-769
[6]   QUANTITATIVE MEASURE OF CONTINUITY OF CARE [J].
BICE, TW ;
BOXERMAN, SB .
MEDICAL CARE, 1977, 15 (04) :347-349
[7]   Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness [J].
Bodenheimer, T ;
Wagner, EH ;
Grumbach, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (14) :1775-1779
[8]   A Matched-Pair Cluster-Randomized Trial of Guided Care for High-Risk Older Patients [J].
Boult, Chad ;
Leff, Bruce ;
Boyd, Cynthia M. ;
Wolff, Jennifer L. ;
Marsteller, Jill A. ;
Frick, Kevin D. ;
Wegener, Stephen ;
Reider, Lisa ;
Frey, Katherine ;
Mroz, Tracy M. ;
Karm, Lya ;
Scharfstein, Daniel O. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (05) :612-621
[9]  
Chaplin K, BMJ OPEN
[10]   Safer Prescribing - A Trial of Education, Informatics, and Financial Incentives [J].
Dreischulte, Tobias ;
Donnan, Peter ;
Grant, Aileen ;
Hapca, Adrian ;
McCowan, Colin ;
Guthrie, Bruce .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (11) :1053-1064