Comparisons of computational methods for differential alternative splicing detection using RNA-seq in plant systems

被引:65
|
作者
Liu, Ruolin [1 ]
Loraine, Ann E. [2 ]
Dickerson, Julie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Elect & Computat Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Bioinformat & Genom, Kannapolis, NC 28081 USA
来源
BMC BIOINFORMATICS | 2014年 / 15卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
RNAseq; Alternative splicing; Plants; EXPRESSION; PROTEIN; GENES; ROLES;
D O I
10.1186/s12859-014-0364-4
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Alternative Splicing (AS) as a post-transcription regulation mechanism is an important application of RNA-seq studies in eukaryotes. A number of software and computational methods have been developed for detecting AS. Most of the methods, however, are designed and tested on animal data, such as human and mouse. Plants genes differ from those of animals in many ways, e.g., the average intron size and preferred AS types. These differences may require different computational approaches and raise questions about their effectiveness on plant data. The goal of this paper is to benchmark existing computational differential splicing (or transcription) detection methods so that biologists can choose the most suitable tools to accomplish their goals. Results: This study compares the eight popular public available software packages for differential splicing analysis using both simulated and real Arabidopsis thaliana RNA-seq data. All software are freely available. The study examines the effect of varying AS ratio, read depth, dispersion pattern, AS types, sample sizes and the influence of annotation. Using a real data, the study looks at the consistences between the packages and verifies a subset of the detected AS events using PCR studies. Conclusions: No single method performs the best in all situations. The accuracy of annotation has a major impact on which method should be chosen for AS analysis. DEXSeq performs well in the simulated data when the AS signal is relative strong and annotation is accurate. Cufflinks achieve a better tradeoff between precision and recall and turns out to be the best one when incomplete annotation is provided. Some methods perform inconsistently for different AS types. Complex AS events that combine several simple AS events impose problems for most methods, especially for MATS. MATS stands out in the analysis of real RNA-seq data when all the AS events being evaluated are simple AS events.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differential Expression Analysis for RNA-Seq: An Overview of Statistical Methods and Computational Software
    Huang, Huei-Chung
    Niu, Yi
    Qin, Li-Xuan
    CANCER INFORMATICS, 2015, 14 : 57 - 67
  • [22] An evaluation of RNA-seq differential analysis methods
    Li, Dongmei
    Zand, Martin S.
    Dye, Timothy D.
    Goniewicz, Maciej L.
    Rahman, Irfan
    Xie, Zidian
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (09):
  • [23] Outlier detection for improved differential splicing quantification from RNA-Seq experiments with replicates
    Norton, Scott S.
    Vaquero-Garcia, Jorge
    Lahens, Nicholas F.
    Grant, Gregory R.
    Barash, Yoseph
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 34 (09) : 1488 - 1497
  • [24] A Generalized dSpliceType Framework to Detect Differential Splicing and Differential Expression Events Using RNA-Seq
    Zhu, Dongxiao
    Deng, Nan
    Bai, Changxin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NANOBIOSCIENCE, 2015, 14 (02) : 192 - 202
  • [25] 3D RNA-seq: a powerful and flexible tool for rapid and accurate differential expression and alternative splicing analysis of RNA-seq data for biologists
    Guo, Wenbin
    Tzioutziou, Nikoleta A.
    Stephen, Gordon
    Milne, Iain
    Calixto, Cristiane P. G.
    Waugh, Robbie
    Brown, John W. S.
    Zhang, Runxuan
    RNA BIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (11) : 1574 - 1587
  • [26] Systematic evaluation of differential splicing tools for RNA-seq studies
    Mehmood, Arfa
    Laiho, Asta
    Venalainen, Mikko S.
    McGlinchey, Aidan J.
    Wang, Ning
    Elo, Laura L.
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 21 (06) : 2052 - 2065
  • [27] Computational identification of tissue-specific alternative splicing elements in mouse genes from RNA-Seq
    Wen, Ji
    Chiba, Akira
    Cai, Xiaodong
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2010, 38 (22) : 7895 - 7907
  • [28] Computational analysis of alternative polyadenylation from standard RNA-seq and single-cell RNA-seq data
    Gao, Yipeng
    Li, Wei
    MRNA 3' END PROCESSING AND METABOLISM, 2021, 655 : 225 - 243
  • [29] Integrative analysis of many RNA-seq datasets to study alternative splicing
    Li, Wenyuan
    Dai, Chao
    Kang, Shuli
    Zhou, Xianghong Jasmine
    METHODS, 2014, 67 (03) : 313 - 324
  • [30] SplicingTypesAnno: Annotating and quantifying alternative splicing events for RNA-Seq data
    Sun, Xiaoyong
    Zuo, Fenghua
    Ru, Yuanbin
    Guo, Jiqiang
    Yan, Xiaoyan
    Sablok, Gaurau
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2015, 119 (01) : 53 - 62