Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: An RCT

被引:31
|
作者
Eftekhar, Maryam [1 ,2 ]
Hoseini, Masrooreh [1 ]
Saeed, Lida [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Res & Clin Ctr Infertil, Bouali Ave, Safayeh, Yazd, Iran
[2] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Abort Res Ctr, Yazd Reprod Sci Inst, Yazd, Iran
[3] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Afzalipour Hosp, Kerman, Iran
关键词
Progesterone; Polycystic ovarian syndrome; Controlled ovarian stimulation; Frozen-thawed embryo transfer; Pregnancy rate; ESTRADIOL LEVELS; HYPERSTIMULATION; IVF; SUPPLEMENTATION; PROTOCOL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.18502/ijrm.v17i9.5103
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: In vitro fertilization is an important therapy for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The use of new ways of improving clinical results is yet required. Objective: This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy of progesterone primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and compare with conventional antagonist protocol in PCOS. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 PCOS women who were candidates for assisted reproductive technology treatment from August to January 2019 were enrolled in this RCT and were placed into two groups, randomly (n = 60/each). The PPOS group received 20 mg/day Dydrogesterone orally since the second day of the cycle and the control group received antagonist protocol. The pregnancy outcomes including the chemical and clinical pregnancy, the miscarriage rate, and the percent of gestational sacs/transferred embryos was compared in two groups. Results: Number of MII oocyte, maturity rate, Number of 2 pronuclei (2PN) and serum estradiol levels on trigger day were statistically lower in PPOS group (p = 0.019, p = 0.035, p = 0.032, p = 0.030), respectively. Serum LH level on trigger day in PPOS group was higher than antagonist group (p = 0.005). Although there wasn't sever ovarian hyper simulation syndrome in any participants, mild and moderate ovarian hyper simulation syndrome was less in PPOS group (p = 0.001). Also, the chemical and clinical pregnancy rate were higher in the antagonist group, although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.136, p = 0.093 respectively). Conclusion: Our study demonstrate that PPOS does not improve chemical and clinical pregnancy rate of the infertile women with PCOS.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 676
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome: An RCT (vol 17, pg 671, 2019)
    Eftekhar, Maryam
    Hoseini, Masrooreh
    Saeed, Lida
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 19 (06) : 579 - 579
  • [2] The application of progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation protocol in patients with ovarian endometriosis combined with diminished ovarian reserve
    Sun, Qingqing
    Cao, Yijuan
    Gu, Juan
    Xu, Yaqing
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [3] Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in oocyte donation: a model for elective fertility preservation?
    Devesa, Marta
    Racca, Annalisa
    Clua, Elisabet
    Casato, Claudia
    Garcia, Sandra
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    Martinez, Francisca
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 44 (06) : 1015 - 1022
  • [4] Ovarian stimulation in polycystic ovarian syndrome
    Or, Yuval
    Shoham, Zeev
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2006, 91 (05) : S25 - S30
  • [5] Effectiveness of progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ling Cui
    Yonghong Lin
    Fang Wang
    Chen Chen
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 303 : 615 - 630
  • [6] Effectiveness of progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cui, Ling
    Lin, Yonghong
    Wang, Fang
    Chen, Chen
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 303 (03) : 615 - 630
  • [7] Ovarian response and embryo ploidy following oral micronized progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol. A prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles
    Vidal, M. del Mar
    Martinez, Francisca
    Rodriguez, Ignacio
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 (05) : 1098 - 1104
  • [8] Clomiphene or FSH for ovarian Stimulation in polycystic Ovarian Syndrome?
    Fluhr, H.
    GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE, 2012, 10 (03): : 193 - 194
  • [9] EFFECT OF ESTRADIOL INFUSION ON PLASMA GONADOTROPINS AND OVARIAN ACTIVITY IN PROGESTERONE-PRIMED AND UNPRIMED ANESTROUS EWES
    PANT, HC
    JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1977, 75 (02) : 227 - 233
  • [10] Progesterone Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) Vs Clomiphene Primed Ovarian Stimulation (CPOS) in high responder (HR) patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation - A Randomized Control Trial
    Gambhir, I.
    Gedela, D. R.
    Mantravadi, K. C.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37