Condylar and disc positions after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with and without a Le Fort I osteotomy

被引:30
|
作者
Ueki, K. [1 ]
Marukawa, K. [1 ]
Shimada, M. [1 ]
Yoshida, K. [1 ]
Hashiba, Y. [1 ]
Shimizu, C. [1 ]
Nakgawa, K. [1 ]
Alam, S. [1 ]
Yamamoto, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kanazawa Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208641, Japan
关键词
intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy; Le Fort I osteotomy; disc position; angle of condylar long axis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijom.2006.09.021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology and clinical symptoms after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) with and without a Le Fort I osteotomy. Of 50 Japanese patients with mandibular prognathism with mandibular and bimaxillary asymmetry, 25 underwent IVRO and 25 underwent IVRO in combination with a Le Fort I osteotomy. The TMJ symptoms and joint morphology, including disc tissue, were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging and axial cephalogram. Improvement was seen in just 50% of joints with anterior disc displacement (ADD) that received IVRO and 52% of those that received IVRO with Le Fort I osteotomy. Fewer or no TMJ symptoms were reported postoperatively in 97% of the joints that received IVRO and 90% that received IVRO with Le Fort I osteotomy. Postoperatively, there were significant condylar position changes and horizontal changes in the condylar long axis on both sides in the two groups. There were no significant differences between improved ADD and unimproved ADD in condylar position change and the angle of the condylar long axis, although distinctive postoperative condylar sag was seen. These results suggest that IVRO with or without Le Fort I osteotomy can improve ADD and TMJ symptoms along with condylar position and angle, but it is difficult to predict the amount of improvement in ADD.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 213
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: relationship to the shape of the osteotomy line
    Kawase-Koga, Y.
    Mori, Y.
    Fujii, Y.
    Kanno, Y.
    Chikazu, D.
    Susami, T.
    Takato, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (02) : 200 - 204
  • [2] Mandibular condylar displacement and the associated factors following intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy
    Nagata, Yuki
    Moritani, Norifumi
    Amano, Katsuhiko
    Arimura, Yuki
    Nakatsuji, Kazuki
    Kato, Soma
    Mikami, Ayaka
    Matsumura, Tatsushi
    Iida, Seiji
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, 2023, 35 (05) : 390 - 396
  • [3] Remodelling pattern of the ramus on submentovertex cephalographs after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy
    Choi, Young Soo
    Jung, Hwi-Dong
    Kim, Sang Yoon
    Park, Hyung-Sik
    Jung, Young-Soo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 51 (08): : E259 - E262
  • [4] Comparative analysis of the amount of postoperative drainage after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Kim, Hyunyoung
    Chung, Seung-Won
    Jung, Hwi-Dong
    Park, Hyung-Sik
    Jung, Young-Soo
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2014, 40 (04) : 169 - 172
  • [5] CHANGES OF TRANSVERSE MANDIBULAR WIDTH AFTER INTRAORAL VERTICAL RAMUS OSTEOTOMY
    Park, Sung-Yeon
    Jung, Young-Soo
    Choi, Young-Dal
    Park, Hyung-Sik
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2006, 32 (05) : 447 - 452
  • [6] Accuracy of Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy With a Stereolithographic Template
    Chen, Xia-Yun
    Chen, Song-Ling
    Zhang, Xing
    Li, Jian-Ping
    Deng, Wei
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2011, 66 (01) : 88 - 91
  • [7] Two-thirds anteroposterior ramus length is the preferred osteotomy point for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy
    Chun-Ming Chen
    Han-Jen Hsu
    Shih-Wei Liang
    Ping-Ho Chen
    Kun-Jung Hsu
    Yu-Chuan Tseng
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 1229 - 1239
  • [8] Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ram us osteotomy
    Rokutanda, S.
    Yamada, S.
    Yanamoto, S.
    Omori, K.
    Fujimura, Y.
    Morita, Y.
    Rokutanda, H.
    Kohara, H.
    Fujishita, A.
    Nakamura, T.
    Yoshimi, T.
    Yoshida, N.
    Umeda, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (10) : 1316 - 1321
  • [9] Two-thirds anteroposterior ramus length is the preferred osteotomy point for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy
    Chen, Chun-Ming
    Hsu, Han-Jen
    Liang, Shih-Wei
    Chen, Ping-Ho
    Hsu, Kun-Jung
    Tseng, Yu-Chuan
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (02) : 1229 - 1239
  • [10] Rare complication after Le Fort I osteotomy
    Grundig, H.
    Buitrago-Tellez, C.
    Zeilhofer, H. -F.
    Podvinec, M.
    HNO, 2009, 57 (09) : 949 - 952