Prognostic value of routine laboratory variables in prediction of breast cancer recurrence

被引:13
作者
Zhu, Zhu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Ling [2 ]
Ye, Zhong [2 ]
Fu, Tong [1 ]
Du, Ye [1 ]
Shi, Aiping [1 ]
Wu, Di [1 ]
Li, Ke [3 ]
Zhu, Yifan [2 ]
Wang, Chun [2 ,4 ]
Fan, Zhimin [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Breast Surg, Changchun 130021, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Jilin Univ, Dept Emergency, Hosp 1, Changchun 130021, Jilin, Peoples R China
[4] Nantong Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; FREE SURVIVAL; PRIMARY THERAPY; TISSUE FACTOR; FOLLOW-UP; ANEMIA; RISK; DISEASE; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-017-08240-2
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The prognostic value of routine laboratory variables in breast cancer has been largely overlooked. Based on laboratory tests commonly performed in clinical practice, we aimed to develop a new model to predict disease free survival (DFS) after surgical removal of primary breast cancer. In a cohort of 1,596 breast cancer patients, we analyzed the associations of 33 laboratory variables with patient DFS. Based on 3 significant laboratory variables (hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, and international normalized ratio), together with important demographic and clinical variables, we developed a prognostic model, achieving the area under the curve of 0.79. We categorized patients into 3 risk groups according to the prognostic index developed from the final model. Compared with the patients in the low-risk group, those in the medium-and high-risk group had a significantly increased risk of recurrence with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-2.38) and 4.66 (95% CI 3.54-6.14), respectively. The results from the training set were validated in the testing set. Overall, our prognostic model incorporating readily available routine laboratory tests is powerful in identifying breast cancer patients who are at high risk of recurrence. Further study is warranted to validate its clinical application.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Amoroso Vito, 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, P90, DOI 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgv023
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Breast Cancer Facts Figures 2015-2016
[3]  
Argiles Josep M, 2009, Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, V3, P263, DOI 10.1097/SPC.0b013e3283311d09
[4]   Markers for early detection of cancer: Statistical guidelines for nestedcase-control studies [J].
Baker S.G. ;
Kramer B.S. ;
Srivastava S. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) :1-8
[5]   Survival of invasive breast cancer according to the Nottingham Prognostic Index in cases diagnosed in 1990-1999 [J].
Blamey, R. W. ;
Ellis, I. O. ;
Pinder, S. E. ;
Lee, A. H. S. ;
Macmillan, R. D. ;
Morgan, D. A. L. ;
Robertson, J. F. R. ;
Mitchell, M. J. ;
Ball, G. R. ;
Haybittle, J. L. ;
Elston, C. W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (10) :1548-1555
[6]   The MET oncogene drives a genetic programme linking cancer to haemostasis [J].
Boccaccio, C ;
Sabatino, G ;
Medico, E ;
Girolami, F ;
Follenzi, A ;
Reato, G ;
Sottile, A ;
Naldini, L ;
Comoglio, PM .
NATURE, 2005, 434 (7031) :396-400
[7]  
Bottini A, 2002, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V76, pS65
[8]   Estimation and external validation of a new prognostic model for predicting recurrence-free survival for early breast cancer patients in the UK [J].
Campbell, H. E. ;
Gray, A. M. ;
Harris, A. L. ;
Briggs, A. H. ;
Taylor, M. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 103 (06) :776-786
[9]   Several methods to assess improvement in risk prediction models: Extension to survival analysis [J].
Chambless, Lloyd E. ;
Cummiskey, Christopher P. ;
Cui, Gang .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (01) :22-38
[10]   miR-22 as a prognostic factor targets glucose transporter protein type 1 in breast cancer [J].
Chen, Bo ;
Tang, Hailin ;
Liu, Xiaoping ;
Liu, Peng ;
Yang, Lu ;
Xie, Xinhua ;
Ye, Feng ;
Song, Cailu ;
Xie, Xiaoming ;
Wei, Weidong .
CANCER LETTERS, 2015, 356 (02) :410-417