Of using fixation screws/wires as alternative landmarks for cephalometric evaluation after LeFort I osteotomy

被引:12
作者
Lieu, EJW
Huang, CS
Chen, YR
Figueroa, AA
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Craniofacial Ctr, Taipei 105, Taiwan
[2] Univ Illinois, Craniofacial Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Orthodont, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70299-9
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The most widely used method to measure postoperative stability of a surgically repositioned bony segment is based on skeletal landmarks, Unfortunately, orthognathic surgery may alter the skeletal landmarks and bony configurations that are commonly used for cephalometric analysis. Intraosseous wires, plates, and screws are routinely used in orthognathic surgery, and postoperatively they are easier to identify than skeletal landmarks, Cephalometric radiographs from 25 adult patients, who had undergone LeFort I one piece osteotomy, were used to analyze the validity of fixation wires/screws used as landmarks to evaluate postoperative stability of the maxilla. The positional changes of maxillary skeletal landmarks (A point and anterior and posterior nasal spines) and intraosseous fixation wires/screws were measured relative to the cranial base, The fixation screws/wires were also measured relative to the invariant maxillary trabecular patterns and palatal plane from 1 to 6 weeks (T1-T2) and 6 weeks to 1 year postoperatively. The reproducibility of fixation wires/screws was found to be higher than that of skeletal landmarks, The fixation wires/screws remained stable in the maxilla; their postoperative positional changes were not significantly different from those of the skeletal landmarks. When the skeletal landmarks are altered or no longer exist after LeFort I osteotomy, fixation wires/screws could be used as alternative landmarks to measure the maxillary postoperative stability.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 292
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   RELIABILITY OF HEAD FILM MEASUREMENTS .1. LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION [J].
BAUMRIND, S ;
FRANTZ, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1971, 60 (02) :111-&
[2]   STABILITY OF THE LEFORT-I ONE-PIECE MAXILLARY OSTEOTOMY [J].
BISHARA, SE ;
CHU, GW ;
JAKOBSEN, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 94 (03) :184-200
[3]   COMPARISONS OF POSTSURGICAL STABILITY OF THE LEFORT-I MAXILLARY IMPACTION AND MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT [J].
BISHARA, SE ;
CHU, GW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 102 (04) :335-341
[5]  
BJORK A, 1976, FACTORS AFFECTING GR, P61
[6]  
BJORK ARNE, 1955, ACTA ODONTOL SCAND, V13, P9, DOI 10.3109/00016355509028170
[7]  
BJORK ARNE, 1966, ACTA ODONTOL SCAND, V24, P109, DOI 10.3109/00016356609026122
[8]   CHANGES DURING AND FOLLOWING TOTAL MAXILLARY OSTEOTOMY (LE-FORT-I PROCEDURE) - A CEPHALOMETRIC STUDY [J].
BUNDGAARD, M ;
MELSEN, B ;
TERP, S .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1986, 8 (01) :21-29
[9]   STABILITY OF LEFORT-I OSTEOTOMY WITH MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT - A COMPARISON OF COMBINED WIRE FIXATION AND RIGID FIXATION [J].
EGBERT, M ;
HEPWORTH, B ;
MYALL, R ;
WEST, R .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 53 (03) :243-248
[10]  
HOCHBAN W, 1993, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V30, P237, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1993)030<0237:LTRAMA>2.3.CO