Estimating the economic benefits and costs of highly-protected marine protected areas

被引:25
作者
Davis, Katrina J. [1 ,4 ]
Vianna, Gabriel M. S. [2 ,3 ]
Meeuwig, Jessica J. [3 ]
Meekan, Mark G. [2 ]
Pannell, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Environm Econ & Policy, UWA Sch Agr & Environm, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[2] UWA Oceans Inst, Australian Inst Marine Sci, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Biol Sci, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
[4] Univ Exeter, Land Environm Econ & Policy Inst, Business Sch, Xfi Bldg,Rennes Dr, Exeter EX4 4ST, Devon, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
compliance costs; decision making; establishment costs; maintenance costs; market benefits; non-market benefits; with-vs; -without; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SHARK-DIVING TOURISM; TRANSACTION-COSTS; BIOECONOMIC MODEL; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; RESERVES; CONSERVATION; VALUATION; IMPACTS; CORAL;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.2879
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an increasingly popular, but debated, management strategy to conserve marine biodiversity and ensure sustainable human use of the oceans. Economic studies can contribute to the debate about MPAs as a management option by evaluating their benefits and costs to society. In this paper, we outline how to evaluate the economic benefits and costs of MPAs and provide examples from the literature to demonstrate the methods described. We review challenges and opportunities of different economic methods. One key challenge is to meaningfully compare market and non-market benefits of MPAs-this comparison is complicated by the scarcity of studies that quantify the non-market benefits of MPAs. Another key challenge is to quantify how the value of marine areas may change with and without MPAs. Costs are often easier to estimate than benefits, but some costs-such as maintenance and compliance costs-are rarely recognized. Analytical choices will influence the identified economic costs and benefits of MPAs. For example, the spatial extent of analyses will influence what changes in underlying ecological processes are captured and conclusions about the equitable distribution of costs and benefits across society. For these reasons, it is important that managers are aware of the challenges and opportunities described here, so that they can obtain and use the best-quality economic information to guide decision making about MPAs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Willingness to pay for unfamiliar public goods: Preserving cold-water coral in Norway [J].
Aanesen, Margrethe ;
Armstrong, Claire ;
Czajkowski, Mikolaj ;
Falk-Petersen, Jannike ;
Hanley, Nick ;
Navrud, Stale .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 112 :53-67
[2]   Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation [J].
Adamowicz, W ;
Boxall, P ;
Williams, M ;
Louviere, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 80 (01) :64-75
[3]  
Agardy T, 2000, B MAR SCI, V66, P875
[4]   Valuing recreational and conservation benefits of coral reefs - The case of Bolinao, Philippines [J].
Ahmed, Mahfuzuddin ;
Umali, Gloria Magnayon ;
Chong, Chiew Kieok ;
Rull, Mary Franz ;
Garcia, Marissa C. .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 50 (1-2) :103-118
[5]  
Alban F., 2008, EC ANAL MARINE PROTE
[6]   A new typology of benefits derived from marine protected areas [J].
Angulo-Valdes, Jorge A. ;
Hatcher, Bruce G. .
MARINE POLICY, 2010, 34 (03) :635-644
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GREEN BOOK APPR EV C
[8]   Divers' willingness to pay to visit marine sanctuaries: an exploratory study [J].
Arin, T ;
Kramer, RA .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 45 (2-3) :171-183
[9]   A note on the ecological-economic modelling of marine reserves in fisheries [J].
Armstrong, Claire W. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (02) :242-250
[10]   Use and Non-Use Values in an Applied Bioeconomic Model of Fisheries and Habitat Connections [J].
Armstrong, Claire W. ;
Vondolia, Godwin K. ;
Aanesen, Margrethe ;
Kahui, Viktoria ;
Czajkowski, Mikolaj .
MARINE RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2017, 32 (04) :351-369