Usability of Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Assessments in Schools: A Systematic Review From 2009 to 2019

被引:32
作者
Brann, Kristy L. [1 ]
Daniels, Brian [2 ]
Chafouleas, Sandra M. [3 ]
DiOrio, Courtney A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT USA
关键词
social; emotional; behavioral assessment; school-based screening; progress monitoring; multitiered systems of support; usability; RISK SCREENING SCALE; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT INTEGRITY; TREATMENT UTILITY; VALIDITY; ELEMENTARY; RELIABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; VALIDATION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1080/2372966X.2020.1836518
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
To fully execute multitiered systems of support (MTSS), schools must have access to screening and progress monitoring measures that are defensible and appropriate for intended use yet also must be usable within the intended context Usability is the extent to which a measure, process, or system is acceptable and can be feasibly used by stakeholders to achieve intended goals. The current study systematically reviewed the prevalence of usability research for school-based screening and progress monitoring of social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) domains. Results found a lack of studies specifically evaluating features of usability; most articles focused on results related to appropriateness for intended use and technical adequacy. For articles that did evaluate usability, the majority examined teacher perception of feasibility and acceptability. Further, the majority of measures provided some explication of support for tiered problem solving (e.g., assessing SEB functioning at the population level, monitoring student response to targeted/intensive intervention) and did not provide an explicit link between screening and progress monitoring measures. Overall, results highlight a need for greater emphasis on research evaluating the usability of SEB measures for use within an MTSS system.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 24
页数:19
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
American Educational Research Association [AERA] American Psychological Association (APA) National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[2]  
Anderson JK, 2019, PSYCHOL MED, V49, P9, DOI [10.1017/S0033291718002490, 10.1017/s0033291718002490]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, STUDENT RISK SCREENI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SOCIAL VALIDIT UNPUB
[5]  
Briesch A. M., 2020, SCH BUILDING ADM REP
[6]   Assessing influences on intervention implementation: Revision of the Usage Rating Profile-Intervention [J].
Briesch, Amy M. ;
Chafouleas, Sandra M. ;
Neugebauer, Sabina Rak ;
Riley-Tillman, T. Chris .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 51 (01) :81-96
[7]   A Preliminary Investigation of Emotional and Behavioral Screening Practices in K-12 Schools [J].
Bruhn, Allison Leigh ;
Woods-Groves, Suzanne ;
Huddle, Sally .
EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN, 2014, 37 (04) :611-634
[8]  
Chafouleas S. M., 2020, EXPLORING PRED UNPUB
[9]  
Chafouleas S.M., 2012, Usage Rating Profile - Assessment
[10]   Using Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to Screen for School Social Risk A Preliminary Comparison of Methods in a Kindergarten Sample [J].
Chafouleas, Sandra M. ;
Kilgus, Stephen P. ;
Hernandez, Paul .
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2009, 34 (04) :214-223