Irritation test of tissue adhesives for facial prostheses

被引:23
作者
Dahl, JE [1 ]
Polyzois, GL
机构
[1] NIOM, Scandinavian Inst Dent Mat, Haslum, Norway
[2] Univ Athens, Sch Dent, Dept Removable Prosthodont, Maxillofacial Prosthet Serv, Athens, Greece
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mpr.2000.109506
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Adhesives are commonly used to improve the retention of a facial prosthesis to the skin. Although no requirement exists for facial prosthetic adhesives, an adhesive should be nonirritating and nontoxic. Purpose. This study assessed the irritative potential of facial prosthetic adhesives by using an in vitro technique for detection of eye-irritating chemicals. Material and methods. Tell adhesives were evaluated by the hens egg test chorioallantoic membrane method. Adhesives were applied to the chorioallantoic membrane in fertilized hen eggs, and the membrane examined by a photomacroscope for injury to the blood vessels. The average irritation score was calculated from the recorded times for the debut of hemorrhage, lysis, and coagulation, and the products were classified as being non, slight, moderate, or strong irritants, based on the irritation score. Results. The predominant injury to the membrane was coagulation of blood vessels, and the exposure time needed to initiate the reaction was dependent on the composition of the product. Four products were classified as strong irritants, 1 as moderate, and the remaining 5 as slight or nonirritant. Conclusion. On the basis of a test for eye irritation, the irritant potential of tissue adhesives varied from non to severe. The most severe reactions were mainly seen in products containing the solvent ethyl acetate.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 457
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ADISMAN IK, 1996, PROSTHODONTICS PRINC, P201
[2]   The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test [J].
Balls, M ;
Botham, PA ;
Bruner, LH ;
Spielmann, H .
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1995, 9 (06) :871-929
[3]  
Beumer J, 1996, MAXILLOFACIAL REHABI, V2, P377
[4]   Irritation of dental adhesive agents evaluated by the HET-CAM test [J].
Dahl, JE .
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1999, 13 (02) :259-264
[5]   Comparison of low-volume, Draize and in vitro eye irritation test data .1. Hydroalcoholic formulations [J].
Gettings, SD ;
Lordo, RA ;
Demetrulias, J ;
Feder, PI ;
Hintze, KL .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 34 (08) :737-749
[6]   THE CTFA EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM - AN EVALUATION OF IN-VITRO ALTERNATIVES TO THE DRAIZE PRIMARY EYE IRRITATION TEST - (PHASE-II) OIL/WATER EMULSIONS [J].
GETTINGS, SD ;
DIPASQUALE, LC ;
BAGLEY, DM ;
CASTERTON, PL ;
CHUDKOWSKI, M ;
CURREN, RD ;
DEMETRULIAS, JL ;
FEDER, PI ;
GALLI, CL ;
GAY, R ;
GLAZA, SM ;
HINTZE, KL ;
JANUS, J ;
KURTZ, PJ ;
LORDO, RA ;
MARENUS, KD ;
MORAL, J ;
MUSCATIELLO, M ;
PAPE, WJW ;
RENSKERS, KJ ;
RODDY, MT ;
ROZEN, MG .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 32 (10) :943-976
[7]  
*INT AG RES CANC, 1990, IARC MON EV CARC RIS, V47
[8]   A NATIONAL VALIDATION PROJECT OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO THE DRAIZE RABBIT EYE TEST [J].
KALWEIT, S ;
BESOKE, R ;
GERNER, I ;
SPIELMANN, H .
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1990, 4 (4-5) :702-706
[9]  
LEMON JC, 1995, P 1 INT C MAX PROSTH, P116
[10]  
LONNROTH EC, 1999, INT J OCCUP SAF ERGO, V5, P41