Feasibility Study of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Cancer Bone Pain

被引:40
作者
Bennett, Michael I. [1 ]
Johnson, Mark I. [2 ]
Brown, Sarah R. [3 ]
Radford, Helen [3 ]
Brown, Julia M. [3 ]
Searle, Robert D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Int Observ End Life Care, Sch Hlth & Med, Lancaster, England
[2] Leeds Metropolitan Univ, Leeds LS1 3HE, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Clin Trials Res Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] St James Univ Hosp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS); pain; cancer of bone; randomized controlled trial; palliative care; PARAMETER MANIPULATION; CLINICAL IMPORTANCE; SAMPLE-SIZE; TRIALS; METAANALYSIS; INTENSITY; THRESHOLDS; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES; RELEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
This multicenter study assessed the feasibility of conducting a phase Ill trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in patients with cancer bone pain recruited from palliative care services. Eligible patients received active and placebo TENS for 1 hour at site of pain in a randomized crossover design; median interval between applications 3 days. Responses assessed at 30 and 60 minutes included numerical and verbal ratings of pain at rest and on movement, and pain relief. Recruitment, tolerability, adverse events, and effectiveness of blinding were also evaluated. Twenty-four patients were randomised and 19 completed both applications. The intervention was well tolerated. Five patients withdrew: 3 due to deteriorating performance status, and 2 due to increased pain (1 each following active and placebo TENS). Confidence interval estimation around the differences in outcomes between active and placebo TENS suggests that TENS has the potential to decrease pain on movement more than pain on rest. Nine patients did not consider that a placebo was used; the remaining 10 correctly identified placebo TENS. Feasibility studies are important in palliative care prior to undertaking clinical trials. Our findings suggest that further work is required on recruitment strategies and refining the control arm before evaluating TENS in cancer bone pain. Perspective: Cancer bone pain is common and severe, and partly mediated by hyperexcitability. Animal studies suggest that Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation can reduce hyperalgesia. This study examined the feasibility of evaluating TENS in patients with cancer bone pain in order to optimize methods before a phase III trial. (C) 2010 by the American Pain Society
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 359
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) electrode placement on spontaneous and noxiously evoked dorsal horn cell activity in the cat [J].
Garrison, DW ;
Foreman, RD .
NEUROMODULATION, 2002, 5 (04) :231-237
[22]  
Jensen M.P., 2001, HDB PAIN ASSESSMENT, V2nd, P15
[23]   Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures [J].
Jensen, MP ;
Turner, JA ;
Romano, JM ;
Fisher, LD .
PAIN, 1999, 83 (02) :157-162
[24]   An investigation into the analgesic effects of interferential currents and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on experimentally induced ischemic pain in otherwise pain-free volunteers [J].
Johnson, MI ;
Tabasam, G .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2003, 83 (03) :208-223
[25]  
Johnson MI., 2008, ELECTROTHERAPY EVIDE, V11th, P253
[26]  
Johnson MI, 2008, CANC PAIN CLIN PAIN, P235
[27]   Efficacy of electrical nerve stimulation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Johnson, Michael ;
Martinson, Melissa .
PAIN, 2007, 130 (1-2) :157-165
[28]   Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study [J].
Julious, SA .
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2005, 4 (04) :287-291
[29]   Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain [J].
Khadilkar, Amole ;
Odebiyi, Daniel Oluwafemi ;
Brosseau, Lucie ;
Wells, George A. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (04)
[30]   Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice [J].
Lancaster, GA ;
Dodd, S ;
Williamson, PR .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 10 (02) :307-312