Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in periampullary cancer patients receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy

被引:6
作者
Park, Sang Hun [1 ]
Shin, Jun Ho [1 ]
Jung, Kyung Uk [1 ]
Lee, Sung Ryol [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Dept Surg, 29 Saemunan Ro, Seoul 03181, South Korea
关键词
Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Prognosis; Survival; CA-19-9; antigen; Carcinoembryonic antigen; TUMOR-MARKER; PANCREATIC-CANCER; CA-19-9; CEA; CA19-9; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.12.031
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We assessed the use of serum concentrations of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and car-cinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measured during the preoperative diagnostic workup as prognostic factors for survival in patients with periampullary carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with periampullary carcinoma who underwent radical surgery was conducted. Factors related to the survival of periampullary carcinoma patients, including CA 19-9 and CEA, were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the 112 patients included in the results was 66.41 +/- 10.513 years. In the study, the percentage of patients with elevated serum CA 19-9 and CEA concentrations was 65.2% and 24.1%, respectively. CA 19-9 concentrations were correlated with the tumor stage, pre-operative jaundice, and lymphovascular invasion, but CEA concentrations were not. The median overall survival was longer for the normal serum CA 19-9 group than the group with increased CA 19-9 (56 months vs. 25 months, p = 0.003); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the normal serum CEA group and the group with increased CEA (43 months vs. 25 months, p = 0.077). Independent factors related to overall survival were sex, age, stage, presence of jaundice, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, margin status, and elevated serum CA 19-9 concentrations. Conclusions: Periampullary carcinoma patients with elevated serum CA 19-9 concentrations at diagnosis are expected to have poor overall survival. CA 19-9 may be a useful marker for predicting prognosis in patients with periampullary carcinoma at the time of diagnosis. (c) 2021 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 835
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Amin M. B., 2017, AJCC cancer staging manual, V8th
[2]   A CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF MONOCLONAL (CA19-9, CA50, CA12-5) AND POLYCLONAL (CEA, TPA) ANTIBODY-DEFINED ANTIGENS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC-CANCER [J].
BENINI, L ;
CAVALLINI, G ;
ZORDAN, D ;
RIZZOTTI, P ;
RIGO, L ;
BROCCO, G ;
PEROBELLI, L ;
ZANCHETTA, M ;
PEDERZOLI, P ;
SCURO, LA .
PANCREAS, 1988, 3 (01) :61-66
[3]   ENZYME-LINKED PNA LECTIN BINDING ASSAY COMPARED WITH CA19-9 AND CEA RADIOIMMUNOASSAY AS A DIAGNOSTIC BLOOD-TEST FOR PANCREATIC-CANCER [J].
CHING, CK ;
RHODES, JM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 59 (06) :949-953
[4]   SURVIVAL IN 1001 PATIENTS WITH CARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS [J].
CONNOLLY, MM ;
DAWSON, PJ ;
MICHELASSI, F ;
MOOSSA, AR ;
LOWENSTEIN, F .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1987, 206 (03) :366-373
[5]  
DELVILLANO BC, 1983, CLIN CHEM, V29, P549
[6]   EVALUATION OF CA 19-9 AS A SERUM TUMOR-MARKER IN PANCREATIC-CANCER [J].
HAGLUND, C ;
ROBERTS, PJ ;
KUUSELA, P ;
SCHEININ, TM ;
MAKELA, O ;
JALANKO, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1986, 53 (02) :197-202
[7]   CA-242, A NEW TUMOR-MARKER FOR PANCREATIC-CANCER - A COMPARISON WITH CA-19-9, CA-50 AND CEA [J].
HAGLUND, C ;
LUNDIN, J ;
KUUSELA, P ;
ROBERTS, PJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 70 (03) :487-492
[8]  
HAMMARSTROM S, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P4852
[9]   Cancer statistics, 2007 [J].
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Siegel, Rebecca ;
Ward, Elizabeth ;
Murray, Taylor ;
Xu, Jiaquan ;
Thun, Michael J. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2007, 57 (01) :43-66
[10]   Diagnostic and prognostic values of CA 19-9 and CEA in periampullary cancers [J].
Kau, SY ;
Shyr, YM ;
Su, CH ;
Wu, CW ;
Lui, WY .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 188 (04) :415-420