Continuous Multimodal Biometric Authentication Schemes: A Systematic Review

被引:42
作者
Ryu, Riseul [1 ]
Yeom, Soonja [1 ]
Kim, Soo-Hyung [2 ]
Herbert, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Discipline ICT, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Artificial Intelligence Convergence, Gwangju 61861, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Biometrics (access control); Authentication; Systematics; Fuses; Physiology; Feature extraction; Face recognition; continuous authentication; machine learning algorithms; multimodal; USER AUTHENTICATION; LEVEL FUSION; FINGERPRINT; RECOGNITION; IRIS; FACE; ECG;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3061589
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Building safeguards against illegitimate access and authentication is a cornerstone for securing systems. Existing user authentication schemes suffer from challenges in detecting impersonation attacks which leave systems vulnerable and susceptible to misuse. A range of research proposals have suggested continuous multimodal biometric authentication (CMBA) systems as a reliable solution. Though contemporary authentication systems have the potential to change their current authentication scheme, there is a lack of critical analysis of current progress in the field to foster and influence practical solutions. This paper provides a systematic survey of existing literature on CMBA systems, followed by analysis to identify and discuss current research and future trends. The study has found that many diverse biometric characteristics are used for multimodal biometric authentication systems. The majority of the studies in the literature reviewed apply supervised learning approaches as a classification technique, and score level fusion is predominantly used as a fusion model. The review has determined however that there is a lack of comparative analysis on CMBA design in terms of combinations of biometric types (behavioural only, physiological only, or both), machine learning algorithms (unsupervised learning and semi-supervised learning), and fusion models. Most of the studies evaluated a CMBA system's accuracy functionality, such as False Acceptance Rate (FAR), False Rejection Rate (FRR) and Equal Error Rate (EER). However, security, scalability and usability (user acceptance and satisfaction) are generally not addressed thoroughly even though these are key factors for system success in a real deployment. Furthermore, a CMBA system should be implemented and evaluated extensively on real data without restriction to prove that such systems are feasible.
引用
收藏
页码:34541 / 34557
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Acharya S, 2013, 2013 47TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES AND SYSTEMS (CISS)
[2]   Continuous and transparent multimodal authentication: reviewing the state of the art [J].
Al Abdulwahid, Abdulwahid ;
Clarke, Nathan ;
Stengel, Ingo ;
Furnell, Steven ;
Reich, Christoph .
CLUSTER COMPUTING-THE JOURNAL OF NETWORKS SOFTWARE TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 19 (01) :455-474
[3]  
Aljohani N., 2018, P 1 INT C COMP APPL, P1, DOI [10.1109/CAIS.2018.8442022, DOI 10.1109/CAIS.2018.8442022]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, INT J EMERG TRENDS E, V8, P1610, DOI 10. 30534/ijeter/2020/22852020.
[5]   A Survey on Adaptive Authentication [J].
Arias-Cabarcos, Patricia ;
Krupitzer, Christian ;
Becker, Christian .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2019, 52 (04)
[6]   A survey on different continuous authentication systems [J].
Ayeswarya, S. ;
Norman, Jasmine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETRICS, 2019, 11 (01) :67-99
[7]  
Ayeswarya S., 2019, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol, V28, P379
[8]  
Bo C, 2014, IEEE IPCCC
[9]  
Bondi A. B., 2000, Proceedings Second International Workshop on Software and Performance. WOSP2000, P195, DOI 10.1145/350391.350432
[10]  
Chaovalit P., 2005, P 38 ANN HAWAII INT, p112c, DOI [10.1109/hicss.2005.445, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2005.445]