Spatial targeting of payments for ecosystem services to achieve conservation goals and promote social equity and economic impact

被引:6
作者
Soh, Moonwon [1 ]
Cho, Seong-Hoon [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Food & Resource Econ Dept, 1103 McCarty Hall B, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Knoxville, TN USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
economic impact; payments for ecosystem services; social equity; spatial targeting; FOREST CARBON SEQUESTRATION; LAND-USE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; POVERTY REDUCTION; CONTRACT DESIGN; EFFICIENCY; COST; DEPENDENCE; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.1111/nrm.12219
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this research was to identify optimal spatial targeting and distributions of a fixed PES (payment systems for ecosystem services) budget that achieves the three objectives of maximizing forest-based carbon storage to improve cost efficiency, maximizing poverty alleviation to promote equity, and maximizing economic impact to encourage economic development. We used the Central and Southern Appalachian Region as a case study to develop a county-level framework for identifying optimal county targets and optimal budget allocations for forest-based carbon sequestration that addresses the three objectives. The results show that optimal budgets are more geographically widespread under the multiple-objective priority scenarios than under the single-objective of maximizing carbon cost efficiency, and the optimal spatial distributions of the four priority scenarios do not change appreciably across priority scenarios. The quantified relationships reveal that different priority weights among the priority scenarios yield both competitive trade-offs and synergistic relationships between the objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]  
Aassve A, 2006, DEMOGR RES, V15, P21, DOI 10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.2
[2]  
Adhikari B., 2003, PROPERTY RIGHTS NATU
[3]  
Ahn S, 2000, FOREST SCI, V46, P363
[4]   How feasible is carbon sequestration in Korea? A study on the costs of sequestering carbon in forest [J].
Ahn, SoEun .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 41 (01) :89-109
[5]  
[Anonymous], 47462003 SNR NIVA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, National Bureau of Economic Research
[7]  
[Anonymous], PROD SERV
[8]  
[Anonymous], SMALL AR INC POV EST
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 16963 NAT BUR EC RES
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2017, FMIN DOC