Pension schemes versus real estate

被引:7
作者
D'Amato, V [1 ]
Di Lorenzo, E. [2 ]
Haberman, S. [3 ]
Sibilloi, M. [1 ]
Tizzano, R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Econ & Stat, Fisciano, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Econ & Stat Sci, Naples, Italy
[3] City Univ London, Cass Business Sch, London, England
关键词
Reverse mortgage; Home reversion plan; Real estate; Personal pension product;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-019-03241-y
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The demographic, economic and social changes that have characterized the last decades, and the dramatic financial crisis that has taken place since 2008, have led to a demand for structural changes in the pension sector and a growing interest in individual pension products. Hence the need, for most elderly people, to liquidate their fixed assets, which are usually the homes in which they live. This highlights products such as reverse mortgages and domestic reversibility plans. Within this context, we propose a contractual scheme where an immediate life annuity is obtained by paying a single-premium in the form of real estate rights (RERs), for example by transferring to an insurer the property title of a house or a similar realty, while keeping its usufruct or a restricted bundle of rights. The level of the installments depends on the fair value of the transferred RER at the contract's issue, the life expectancy of the insured and the expected growth rate of the real estate market value. The contract design is developed by considering the control of the financial risk inherent in the contract itself, because of the prospective changes in the value of the RERs, and the level of the insurer's leverage. Finally, we provide some numerical evidence of the proposed contractual structure, in order to compare the level of the installments according to the house return forecasts in different European countries.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 809
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Aalbers MB, 2012, SUBPRIME CITIES POLI, DOI [10.1002/9781444347456.ch, DOI 10.1002/9781444347456.CH]
[2]  
Agenzia delle Entrate, 2017, IMMOBILI ITALIA RICC
[3]   Developing Equity Release Markets: Risk Analysis for Reverse Mortgages and Home Reversions [J].
Alai, Daniel ;
Chen, Hua ;
Cho, Daniel ;
Hanewald, Katja ;
Sherris, Michael .
NORTH AMERICAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2014, 18 (01) :217-241
[4]   Is the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage in the United States sustainable? Evidence from pricing mortgage insurance premiums and non-recourse provisions using the conditional Esscher transform [J].
Chen, Hua ;
Cox, Samuel H. ;
Wang, Shaun S. .
INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2010, 46 (02) :371-384
[5]   Appraisals, transaction incentives, and smoothing [J].
Chinloy, P ;
Cho, M ;
Megbolugbe, IF .
JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 1997, 14 (1-2) :89-111
[6]   Explaining why, right or wrong, (Italian) households do not like reverse mortgages [J].
Fornero, Elsa ;
Rossi, Mariacristina ;
Brancati, Maria Cesira Urzi .
JOURNAL OF PENSION ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2016, 15 (02) :180-202
[7]  
Fuente Merencio I. de la, 2018, NEW METHODS FIXED IN, P223, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-95285-7_13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-95285-7_13]
[8]  
Guerin J., 2016, REVERSE REV
[9]   PORTFOLIO CHOICE IN RETIREMENT-WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL HOME EQUITY RELEASE PRODUCT? [J].
Hanewald, Katja ;
Post, Thomas ;
Sherris, Michael .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE, 2016, 83 (02) :421-446
[10]  
Institute and Faculty of Actuaries, 2014, LIFETIME MORTGAGE GO