The Effects of Toothbrush Wear on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Resin Composites with Various Types of Matrices

被引:22
作者
AlAli, Murtadha [1 ,2 ]
Silikas, Nikolaos [2 ]
Satterthwaite, Julian [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Hlth, Alahsa Dent Ctr, Prosthodont Dept, Alahsa 39182, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Med Sci, Div Dent, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
dentistry; restorative composite materials; wear; gloss; surface roughness; dimethylacylates; Bis-GMA; NANOFILL; ORMOCER;
D O I
10.3390/dj9010008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate and compare the surface roughness and gloss of a DMA-free composite and Bis-GMA-free composite with a DMA-based composite before and after toothbrushing simulation. Materials and Methods: Fifteen dimensionally standardised composite specimens of three nano-hybrid resin composites (Tetric EvoCeram, Admira Fusion, and Venus Diamond) were used. Five specimens from each composite were polished and then subjected to a toothbrushing simulator. Surface roughness (Ra) and gloss were measured before toothbrushing and after 5000, 10,000, 15,000, and 20,000 toothbrushing cycles. The data was analysed using 5 x 3 ANOVA to assess surface roughness and gloss values and pairwise comparisons in the form of Tukey post hoc tests were performed to interpret main effects. Results: For all tested materials, surface roughness increased, and gloss decreased after toothbrushing abrasion. Surface roughness (Ra) values ranged from 0.14 to 0.22 mu m at baseline and increased to between 0.41 and 0.49 mu m after 20,000 toothbrushing cycles. Gloss values ranged between 31.9 and 50.6 GU at baseline and between 5.1 and 19.5 GU after 20,000 toothbrushing cycles. The lowest initial Ra value was detected in Venus Diamond and the highest initial gloss value was detected in Tetric EvoCeram. Conclusions: Simulated toothbrushing abrasion led to an increase in surface roughness and a decrease in gloss for all tested materials. Venus Diamond had the smoothest surface and Tetric EvoCeram had the glossiest surface after polishing and following 20,000 cycles of toothbrushing abrasion. Admira Fusion demonstrated the roughest surface and had the lowest gloss values before and after toothbrushing abrasion.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[11]   Resin composite-State of the art [J].
Ferracane, Jack L. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2011, 27 (01) :29-38
[12]  
Garcia Lucas da Fonseca Roberti, 2010, Gen Dent, V58, pe262
[13]   THE INFLUENCE OF ANTAGONISTIC SURFACE ROUGHNESS ON THE WEAR OF HUMAN ENAMEL AND NANOFILLED COMPOSITE RESIN ARTIFICIAL TEETH [J].
Ghazal, Muhamad ;
Kern, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2009, 101 (05) :342-349
[14]   How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods [J].
Heintze, S. D. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2006, 22 (08) :712-734
[15]   Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load [J].
Heintze, S. D. ;
Forjanic, M. ;
Ohmiti, K. ;
Rousson, V. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2010, 26 (04) :306-319
[16]   Resin composite restorative materials [J].
Ilie, N. ;
Hickel, R. .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2011, 56 :59-66
[17]  
Jefferies S R, 1998, Dent Clin North Am, V42, P613
[18]   The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations [J].
Jones, CS ;
Billington, RW ;
Pearson, GJ .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2004, 196 (01) :42-45
[19]   Do nanofill or submicron composites show improved smoothness and gloss? A systematic review of in vitro studies [J].
Kaizer, Marina R. ;
de Oliveira-Ogliari, Aline ;
Cenci, Maximiliano S. ;
Opdam, Niek J. M. ;
Moraes, Rafael R. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2014, 30 (04) :E41-E78
[20]   Ormocer: An aesthetic direct restorative material; An in vitro study comparing the marginal sealing ability of organically modified ceramics and a hybrid composite using an ormocer-based bonding agent and a conventional fifth-generation bonding agent [J].
Kalra, Sarika ;
Singh, Arundeep ;
Gupta, Manish ;
Chadha, Vandana .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2012, 3 (01) :48-53