An analysis of performance models for free water surface wetlands

被引:33
作者
Carleton, James N. [1 ]
Montas, Hubert J. [2 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Off Water, Off Sci & Technol, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Fischell Dept Bioengn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bicontinuum; CSTR; DND; FWS models; Relaxed TIS; Short-circuiting; PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL; WASTE-WATER; CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; RESIDENCE TIME; FLOW VELOCITY; VEGETATION; DENITRIFICATION; TRANSPORT; NITRIFICATION; RETENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2010.04.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although treatment wetlands are intended to attenuate pollutants, reliably predicting their performance remains a challenge because removal processes are often complex, spatially heterogeneous, and incompletely understood. Although initially popular for characterizing wetland performance, plug flow reactor models are problematic because their parameters exhibit correlation with hydraulic loading. One-dimensional advective-dispersive-reactive models may also be inadequate when longitudinal dispersion is non-Fickian as a result of pronounced transverse gradients in velocity (preferential flow). Models that make use of residence time distributions have shown promise in improving wetland performance characterization, however their applicability may be limited by certain inherent assumptions, e.g. that transverse mixing is nil. A recently-developed bicontinuum (mobile mobile) model that addresses some of these weaknesses may hold promise for improving wetland performance modeling, however this model has yet to be tested against real-world wetland data. This paper examines the state of the science of free water surface wetland hydrodynamics and transport modeling, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of various steady state models, and compares them to each other in terms of each model's ability to represent data sets from monitored wetlands. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3595 / 3606
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Potential nitrification and denitrification on different surfaces in a constructed treatment wetland [J].
Bastviken, SK ;
Eriksson, PG ;
Martins, I ;
Neto, JM ;
Leonardson, L ;
Tonderski, K .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2003, 32 (06) :2414-2420
[2]   Evaluation of past and potential phosphorus uptake at the Orlando Easterly Wetland [J].
Black, CA ;
Wise, WR .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 21 (4-5) :277-290
[3]   The influence of vegetation on sedimentation and resuspension of soil particles in small constructed wetlands [J].
Braskerud, BC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2001, 30 (04) :1447-1457
[4]   Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? [J].
Brix, H .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 35 (05) :11-17
[5]  
Carleton J.N., 2009, Modeling Approaches for Treatment Wetlands
[6]   A modeling approach for mixing and reaction in wetlands with continuously varying flow [J].
Carleton, James N. ;
Montas, Hubert J. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 29 (01) :33-44
[7]   Stochastic modeling of reactive transport in wetlands [J].
Carleton, James N. ;
Montas, Hubert J. .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2009, 32 (11) :1615-1631
[8]   Damkohler number distributions and constituent removal in treatment wetlands [J].
Carleton, JN .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 19 (04) :233-248
[9]   The fate and transport of viruses through surface water constructed wetlands [J].
Chendorain, M ;
Yates, M ;
Villegas, F .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1998, 27 (06) :1451-1458
[10]   Nutrient removal from eutrophic lake water by wetland filtration [J].
Coveney, MF ;
Stites, DL ;
Lowe, EF ;
Battoe, LE ;
Conrow, R .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 19 (02) :141-159