Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school

被引:73
作者
Clark, AM
Anderson, RC
Kuo, LJ
Kim, IH
Archodidou, A
Nguyen-Jahiel, K
机构
[1] Appalachian State Univ, Boone, NC 28608 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Ctr Study Reading, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
classroom discussion; reading; reasoning; language development; persuasive discourse;
D O I
10.1023/A:1023429215151
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This article presents a framework to help teachers facilitate small group discussions about stories children read. Collaborative Reasoning discussions are intended to create a forum for children to listen to one another think out loud as they learn to engage in reasoned argumentation. Children use personal experiences and evidence from the stories to support their conclusions and consider each other's points of view. Excerpts from an ongoing study of 12 fourth-grade classrooms in rural, urban, and suburban settings are used to illustrate four characteristics of Collaborative Reasoning: ( 1) children's response to text; ( 2) children's use of text to consider multiple possibilities; ( 3) children's use of tools for persuading others; and ( 4) children's control of topic and turn-taking.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 198
页数:18
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Anderson RC, 1998, LITERACY FOR ALL, P170
  • [2] The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children
    Anderson, RC
    Nguyen-Jahiel, K
    McNurlen, B
    Archodidou, A
    Kim, SY
    Reznitskaya, A
    Tillmanns, M
    Gilbert, L
    [J]. COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2001, 19 (01) : 1 - 46
  • [3] ANGELL RB, 1964, REASONING LOGIC
  • [4] Cazden C.B., 2001, CLASSR DISCOURSE
  • [5] Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion
    Chinn, CA
    Anderson, RC
    Waggoner, MA
    [J]. READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2001, 36 (04) : 378 - 411
  • [6] Chinn CA, 1998, TEACH COLL REC, V100, P315
  • [7] GARDINER J, 1980, STONE FOX
  • [8] GIFF PR, 1990, R MORGAN GOES BAT
  • [9] Holmes E., 1977, AMYS GOOSE
  • [10] KIM S, 2002, DO 4 GRADERS PREFER