Public perceptions and scientific evidence for perceived harms/risks of community water fluoridation: An examination of online comments pertaining to fluoridation cessation in Calgary in 2011

被引:0
作者
Podgorny, Paulina C. [1 ]
McLaren, Lindsay [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE | 2015年 / 106卷 / 06期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Fluoridation; drinking water; safety; risk; evidence-based practice; public health; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.17269/CJPH.106.5031
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To examine the perceived harms/risks of fluoridation as expressed in online forums relating to cessation and aftermath in Calgary, specifically, 1) which harms/risks are mentioned, 2) for those harms/risks, what kinds of evidence are cited, 3) to what extent is scientific literature cited, and what is its quality, and 4) for a subset of harms/risks, what is known from the broader scientific literature? METHODS: Relevant online comments were identified through free-text Internet searches, and those explicitly discussing the harms/risks of water fluoridation were extracted. Types of evidence mentioned were identified, and the scientific papers cited were reviewed. Finally, the broader scientific literature on two of the harms/risks was reviewed and synthesized. SYNTHESIS: We identified 17 distinct groups of harms/risks, which spanned human body systems, the environment and non-human organisms. Most often, no evidence was cited. When evidence was cited, types included individuals viewed as authorities and personal experiences. Reference to scientific articles was rare, and those papers (n = 9) had significant methodological concerns. Our review of scientific literature on fluoride and 1) thyroid functioning and 2) phytoplankton revealed some negative effects of fluoride at concentrations exceeding maximum recommended levels (> 1.5 ppm). CONCLUSION: The findings have implications for communication with the public about fluoridation. First, to the extent that the public consults the scientific literature, it is essential that the methodological limitations of a study, as well as its relevance to community water fluoridation, be widely and promptly communicated. Second, scientific evidence is only one component of why some people support or do not support fluoridation, and communication strategies must accommodate that reality.
引用
收藏
页码:E413 / E425
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, J CAN DENT ASS, V79, pd77
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CANADIAN PERIODICALS, VA25
[3]   Expertise, Health, and Popular Opinion: Debating Water Fluoridation, 1945-80 [J].
Carstairs, Catherine ;
Elder, Rachel .
CANADIAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, 2008, 89 (03) :345-371
[4]   Developmental Fluoride Neurotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Choi, Anna L. ;
Sun, Guifan ;
Zhang, Ying ;
Grandjean, Philippe .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 120 (10) :1362-1368
[5]  
DUAN J, 1995, GUIZHOU MED J, V18, P179
[6]   Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride [J].
Featherstone, JDB .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 27 (01) :31-40
[7]   Fluoride Effects: The Two Faces of Janus [J].
Gazzano, E. ;
Bergandi, L. ;
Riganti, C. ;
Aldieri, E. ;
Doublier, S. ;
Costamagna, C. ;
Bosia, A. ;
Ghigo, D. .
CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 17 (22) :2431-2441
[8]   Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity [J].
Grandjean, Philippe ;
Landrigan, Philip J. .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2014, 13 (03) :330-338
[9]  
Health Canada, 2010, SUMMARY REPORT ON TH
[10]  
Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, 2015, WATER FLUORIDATION F