Utilization effects on battery electric vehicle life-cycle assessment: A case-driven analysis of two commercial mobility applications

被引：34

作者：

Held, Michael ^{[1
]}

Schuecking, Maximilian ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Fraunhofer Inst Bldg Phys IBP, Dept Life Cycle Engn, Wankelstr 5, D-70563 Stuttgart, Germany

[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, IIP, Hertzstr 16, D-76187 Karlsruhe, Germany

来源：

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT | 2019年 / 75卷

关键词：

Battery electric vehicles; Life-cycle assessment; Commercial mobility use-cases; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; PLUG-IN HYBRID; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ION BATTERY; MIX; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; PROFILE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.005

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

The utilization has a significant effect on the life-cycle assessment (LCA) of battery electric vehicles (BEVs). This article evaluates this effect in detail by presenting a case-driven LCA for BEVs deployed in two commercial mobility applications. The empirical data was recorded over 2.5 years and 450,000 km. The findings of this article indicate that regular and predictable mobility demand patterns in combination with a high vehicle utilization are favorable conditions for an environmentally beneficial deployment of BEVs. These characteristics allow tailoring the battery capacity to the requirements and avoiding an unnecessary offset from production. When charging the vehicles with electricity from renewable energy sources (RESs), the high operating grade utilizes the comparatively lower environmental impacts per kilometer. A high lifetime mileage allows breaking-even to comparable internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) in most investigated impact categories. Since regular and predictable mobility patterns, as well as a high operating grade, are commonly found in commercial applications these are especially suitable for replacing ICEVs with BEVs from an environmental perspective.

引用

页码：87 / 105

页数：19

共 68 条

[11]

Buchenau M.-W., 2018, HANDELSBLATT

[12]

Buchert M., 2015, OKOBILANZEN ZUM RECY

[13]

Cerdas F., 2018, Life Cycle Assessment, P669, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_27, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_27]

[14] Uncertain Environmental Footprint of Current and Future Battery Electric Vehicles [J].

Cox, Brian ;

Mutel, Christopher L. ;

Bauer, Christian ;

Beltran, Angelica Mendoza ;

van Vuuren, Detlef P. .

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (08) :4989-4995

[15] Evaluation of emissions of CO2 and air pollutants from electric vehicles in Italian Cities [J].

Donateo, T. ;

Licci, F. ;

D'Elia, A. ;

Colangelo, G. ;

Laforgia, D. ;

Ciancarelli, F. .

APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 157 :675-687

[16] A method to estimate the environmental impact of an electric city car during six months of testing in an Italian city [J].

Donateo, T. ;

Ingrosso, F. ;

Licci, F. ;

Laforgia, D. .

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2014, 270 :487-498

[17] Modeling the CO2 emissions from battery electric vehicles given the power generation mixes of different countries [J].

Doucette, Reed T. ;

McCulloch, Malcolm D. .

ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (02) :803-811

[18] The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling's role in its reduction [J].

Dunn, J. B. ;

Gaines, L. ;

Kelly, J. C. ;

James, C. ;

Gallagher, K. G. .

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 8 (01) :158-168

[19] Life Cycle Assessment of Electric Vehicles - A Framework to Consider Influencing Factors [J].

Egede, Patricia ;

Dettmer, Tina ;

Herrmann, Christoph ;

Kara, Sami .

22ND CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2015, 29 :233-238

[20] Identifying key assumptions and differences in life cycle assessment studies of lithium-ion traction batteries with focus on greenhouse gas emissions [J].

Ellingsen, Linda Ager-Wick ;

Hung, Christine Roxanne ;

Stromman, Anders Hammer .

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 55 :82-90

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →