Beyond the False Negative Rate: Development of Quality Indicators for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

被引:14
作者
Quan, May Lynn [1 ]
Wells, Bryan J. [1 ]
McCready, David [2 ]
Wright, Frances C. [1 ]
Fraser, Novlette [1 ]
Gagliardi, Anna R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
MODIFIED DELPHI APPROACH; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; PHASE-III; OF-CARE; TRIAL; DISSECTION; RESECTION; SURGERY; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-009-0658-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) has been adopted as the standard method of axillary staging for women with clinically node-negative early-stage breast cancer. The false negative rate as a quality indicator is impractical given the need for a completion axillary dissection to calculate. The objective of this study was to develop practical quality indicators for SLNB using an expert consensus method and to determine if they were feasible to measure. Materials and Methods. We used a modified Delphi consensus process to develop quality indicators for SLNB. A multidisciplinary expert panel reviewed potential indicators extracted from the medical literature to select quality indicators that were relevant and measurable. Feasibility was determined by abstracting the quality indicator variables from a retrospective chart review. Results. The expert panel prioritized 11 quality indicators as benchmarks for assessing the quality of surgical care in SNLB. Nine of the indicators were measurable at the chart or institutional level. Conclusions. A systematic evidence-and consensus-based approach was used to develop measurable quality indicators that could be used by practicing surgeons and administrators to evaluate performance of SLNB in breast cancer. Conclusions. A systematic evidence- and consensus-based approach was used to develop measurable quality indicators that could be used by practicing surgeons and administrators to evaluate performance of SLNB in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 591
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] *AM SOC BREAST SUR, 2006, CONS STAT GUID PERF
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer
  • [3] ASCO/NCCN Quality Measures, 2007, ASCO NCCN QUAL MEAS
  • [4] Quality of care .1. What is it?
    Blumenthal, D
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (12) : 891 - 894
  • [5] The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey - Results of a randomized controlled trial
    Campbell, SM
    Hann, M
    Roland, MO
    Quayle, JA
    Shekelle, PG
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1999, 37 (09) : 964 - 968
  • [6] Defining quality of care
    Campbell, SM
    Roland, MO
    Buetow, SA
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (11) : 1611 - 1625
  • [7] Cantin J, 2001, CAN MED ASSOC J, V165, P166
  • [8] The learning curve in sentinel node biopsy: The ALMANAC experience
    Clarke, D
    Newcombe, RG
    Mansel, RE
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (03) : 211S - 215S
  • [9] American society of clinical oncology/national comprehensive cancer network quality measures
    Desch, Christopher E.
    McNiff, Kristen K.
    Schneider, Eric C.
    Schrag, Deborah
    McClure, Joan
    Lepisto, Eva
    Donaldson, Molla S.
    Kahn, Katherine L.
    Weeks, Jane C.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Stewart, Andrew K.
    Edge, Stephen B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (21) : 3631 - 3637
  • [10] Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer
    Fisher, B
    Anderson, S
    Bryant, J
    Margolese, RG
    Deutsch, M
    Fisher, ER
    Jeong, J
    Wolmark, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) : 1233 - 1241