An Untold Story: The Important Contributions of Muslim Scholars for the Understanding of Human Anatomy

被引:16
作者
Alghamdi, Malak A. [1 ]
Ziermann, Janine M. [1 ]
Diogo, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Howard Univ, Dept Anat, Coll Med, Washington, DC 20059 USA
来源
ANATOMICAL RECORD-ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY | 2017年 / 300卷 / 06期
关键词
Galen; history of science; biology; muscles; nerves; biases; Arabs; Persians; PULMONARY-CIRCULATION; AL-AKHAWAYNI; ANCIENT; HISTORY; PHYSICIAN; RHAZES; OPTICS; SYSTEM; PERSIA;
D O I
10.1002/ar.23523
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
It is usually assumed that Galen is one of the fathers of anatomy and that between the Corpus Galenicum and the Renaissance there was no major advance in anatomical knowledge. However, it is also consensually accepted that Muslim scholars had the intellectual leadership from the 8th/9th to 13th centuries, and that they made remarkable progresses in numerous scientific fields including medicine. So, how is it possible that they did not contribute to advance human anatomy during that period? According to the dominant view, Muslim scholars exclusively had a passive role: their transmission of knowledge from the Greeks to the West. Here, we summarize, for the first time in a single paper, the studies of major Muslim scholars that published on human anatomy before Vesalius. This summary is based on analyses of original Arabic texts and of more recent publications by anatomists and historians, and on comparisons between the descriptions provided by Galen and by these Muslim scholars. We show that Arabic speakers and Persians made important advances in human anatomy well before Vesalius. The most notable exception concerns the muscular system: strikingly, there were apparently neither advances made by Muslims nor by Westerners for more than 1000 years. Unbiased discussions of these and other related issues, and particularly of the mainly untold story about the major contributions of Muslim scholars to anatomy, are crucial to our knowledge of the history of anatomy, biology and sciences, and also of our way of thinking, biases, and prejudices. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:986 / 1008
页数:23
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [21] Al-Akhawayni and Early Differentiation Between Nerves and Tendons
    Dalfardi, Behnam
    Yarmohammadi, Hassan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 39 (04): : 808 - 808
  • [22] How did Haly Abbas look at the cardiovascular system?
    Dalfardi, Behnam
    Nezhad, Golnoush Sadat Mahmoudi
    Mehdizadeh, Alireza
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 172 (01) : 36 - 39
  • [23] Ibn al-Haytham (965-1039 AD), the original portrayal of the modern theory of vision
    Daneshfard, Babak
    Dalfardi, Behnam
    Nezhad, Golnoush Sadat Mahmoudi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL BIOGRAPHY, 2016, 24 (02) : 227 - 231
  • [24] The origins of the theory of capillary circulation
    Daneshfard, Babak
    Yarmohammadi, Hassan
    Dalfardi, Behnam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 172 (02) : 491 - 492
  • [25] Contributions of Medieval Islamic Physicians to the History of Tracheostomy
    Golzari, Samad E. J.
    Khan, Zahid Hussain
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Hosseinzadeh, Hamzeh
    Soleimanpour, Hassan
    Azarfarin, Rasoul
    Mahmoodpoor, Ata
    Aslanabadi, Saeid
    Ansarin, Khalil
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 116 (05) : 1123 - 1132
  • [26] Ibn Abbas Ali Al-Majusi, KETAB KAMEL AL SENA
  • [27] Ibn Al-Nafis Abu Al-Hasan, MUJAZ AL QANUN
  • [28] Ibn Ilyas Mansur ibn Mohammad ibn Ahmad ibn Yousef, 1709, TASRIH I MANSURI MAN
  • [29] Ibn Rushd Ab Al-Wald Muhammad ibn Ahmad, AL KULLIYAT FI AL TI
  • [30] Ihsanoglu Ekmeleddin., 2004, Science, Technology, and Learning in the Ottoman Empire