Wishful Thinking in the 2008 US Presidential Election

被引:44
作者
Krizan, Zlatan [1 ]
Miller, Jeffrey C. [1 ]
Johar, Omesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
optimism; predictions; election; motivated reasoning; likelihood judgment; DESIRABILITY; BANDWAGON; VOTERS; PREDICTION; UNDERDOG; POLLS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0956797609356421
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In elections, political preferences are strongly linked to the expectations of the electoral winner-people usually expect their favorite candidate to win. This link could be driven by wishful thinking (a biasing influence of preferences), driven by a biasing influence of expectations on one's wishes, or produced spuriously. To examine these competing possibilities in the 2008 U.S. presidential election, a longitudinal study assessed uncommitted young voters' electoral expectations and preferences over four time points during the month before the election. The findings indicated clear support for wishful thinking: Over time, people's preferences shaped their expectations, but the reverse was not the case. Moreover, these relations were larger among those more strongly identified with their political party and held even when perceptions of general candidate popularity were taken into account. Finally, changes in electoral expectations were consequential, as they shaped disappointment in the electoral results even after taking candidate preferences into account.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CONTRIBUTIONS DECISI
[2]  
Babad E, 1997, INT J PUBLIC OPIN R, V9, P105
[3]   The prediction of social events [J].
Cantril, H .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1938, 33 :364-389
[4]   JUMPING ON THE BANDWAGON WITH THE UNDERDOG - THE IMPACT OF ATTITUDE POLLS ON POLLING BEHAVIOR [J].
CECI, SJ ;
KAIN, EL .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1982, 46 (02) :228-242
[5]   Knowing versus caring: The role of affect and cognition in political perceptions [J].
Dolan, KA ;
Holbrook, TM .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 22 (01) :27-44
[6]   A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments [J].
Edwards, K ;
Smith, EE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (01) :5-24
[7]   CLASSIFYING UNDECIDED VOTERS IN PRE-ELECTION POLLS [J].
FENWICK, I ;
WISEMAN, F ;
BECKER, JF ;
HEIMAN, JR .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1982, 46 (03) :383-391
[8]  
Finkel S., 1995, Quantitative Applications in Social Science, DOI 10.4135/9781412983594
[9]  
*GALL POLL INC, 2009, EL 2008
[10]   WHEN PROPHECY BENDS - THE PREFERENCE EXPECTATION LINK IN UNITED-STATES PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, 1952-1980 [J].
GRANBERG, D ;
BRENT, E .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 45 (03) :477-491