Herd-specific interventions to reduce antimicrobial usage in pig production without jeopardising technical and economic performance

被引:53
作者
Collineau, L. [1 ,2 ]
Rojo-Gimeno, C. [3 ,4 ]
Leger, A. [1 ]
Backhans, A. [5 ]
Loesken, S. [6 ]
Nielsen, E. Okholm [7 ]
Postma, M. [4 ]
Emanuelson, U. [5 ]
Beilage, E. Grosse [6 ]
Sjolund, M. [5 ,8 ]
Wauters, E. [3 ]
Stark, K. D. [1 ]
Dewulf, J. [4 ]
Belloc, C. [2 ]
Krebs, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] SAFOSO AG, Waldeggstr 1, CH-3097 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Oniris, INRA, BIOEPAR, F-44307 Nantes, France
[3] Inst Agr & Fisheries Res, Social Sci Unit Burg, Van Gansberghelaan 115,Box 2, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[4] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Vet Epidemiol Unit, Dept Reprod Obstet & Herd Hlth, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Clin Sci, POB 7054, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Univ Vet Med Hannover, Field Stn Epidemiol, Buscheler Str 9, D-49456 Bakum, Germany
[7] Danish Agr & Food Council, Pig Res Ctr, Axeltorv 3, DK-1609 Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] SVA, Natl Vet Inst, Dept Anim Hlth & Antimicrobial Strategies, SE-75189 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Antibiotics; Preventive measures; Compliance; Technical performance; Margin over feed cost; Net farm profit; FARMERS; SWEDISH; BELGIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.023
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Pig farmers are strongly encouraged to reduce their antimicrobial usage in order to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance. Herd-level intervention is needed to achieve national and European reduction targets. Alternative, especially preventive measures, have to be implemented to reduce the need for antimicrobial treatments. However, little is known about the feasibility, effectiveness and return on investment of such measures. The objective of this study was to assess, across four countries, the technical and economic impact of herd-specific interventions aiming at reducing antimicrobial usage in pig production while implementing alternative measures. An intervention study was conducted between February 2014 and August 2015 in 70 farrow-to-finish pig farms located in Belgium, France, Germany and Sweden. Herd-specific interventions were defined together with the farmer and the herd veterinarian. Farms were followed over one year and their antimicrobial usage and technical performance were compared with values from the year before intervention. Compliance with the intervention plan was also monitored. Changes in margin over feed cost and net farm profit were estimated in a subset of 33 Belgian and French farms with sufficient data, using deterministic and stochastic modeling. Following interventions, a substantial reduction in antimicrobial use was achieved without negative impact the overall farm technical performance. A median reduction of 47.0% of antimicrobial usage was achieved across four countries when expressed in terms of treatment incidence from birth to slaughter, corresponding to a 30.5% median reduction of antimicrobial expenditures. Farm compliance with intervention plans was high (median: 93%; min-max: 20; 100) and farms with higher compliance tended to achieve bigger reduction (rho = -0.18, p = 0.162). No association was found between achieved reduction and type or number of alternative measures implemented. Mortality in suckling piglets, weaners and fatteners, daily weight gain and feed conversion ratio did not significantly change over the course of the study, while the number of weaned piglets per sow per year slightly increased. The median change in net farm profit among Belgian and French farms was estimated to be (sic)4.46 (Q25-Q75:-32.54; 80.50) and (sic)1.23 (Q25-Q75:-32.55; 74.45) per sow per year using the detererministic and stochastic models, respectively. It was more influenced by a change in feed conversion ratio and daily weight gain than by a change in antimicrobial expenditures or intervention direct net cost. Therefore, costs of alternative measures should not be perceived as a barrier, but rather as an opportunity to optimise production practices for sustained productivity and improved animal health. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 178
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, 2016, 2014 PIG COST PROD S
[2]  
AMCRA, 2013, AV OX DE ZINC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ZOONOSES PUBLIC HLTH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, WORLD HLTH ORG GLOB
[5]  
Anses, 2015, SAL SURV VET MED PRO
[6]  
Barnard C.S., 1979, FARM PLANNING CONTRO
[7]  
BelVet-SAC,, 2014, NAT CONS REP 2014
[8]   Understanding antimicrobial use and prescribing behaviours by pig veterinary surgeons and farmers: a qualitative study [J].
Coyne, L. A. ;
Pinchbeck, G. L. ;
Williams, N. J. ;
Smith, R. F. ;
Dawson, S. ;
Pearson, R. B. ;
Latham, S. M. .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2014, 175 (23) :593-593
[9]  
European Medicines Agency, 2015, EMA3879342015
[10]  
FIP French Pork and Pig Institute, 2014, PORC CHIFFR 2014 201