Biotic and abiotic stress responses of interspecific hybrid cherry rootstocks

被引:7
|
作者
Lang, G [1 ]
Howell, W [1 ]
Ophardt, D [1 ]
Mink, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Ctr Irrigated Agr Res & Extens Ctr, Prosser, WA 99350 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATING CANOPY, ROOTSTOCKS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY IN ORCHARD SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS - VOLS 1 AND 2 | 1997年 / 451期
关键词
Prunus avium; ilarviruses; hypersensitivity; cold hardiness;
D O I
10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.451.22
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Interspecific hybrid cherry rootstocks have been under horticultural test in the United States for about 10 years. Several of the more promising rootstocks (in terms of improved precocity and/or vigor control) are being examined at Washington State University for responses to critical biotic (ilarviruses) and abiotic (flower bud cold hardiness) stresses in the Pacific Northwest, where the majority of North American fresh market sweet cherries (Prunus avium) are grown. Among the best rootstocks are hybrid crosses between P. avium or P. cerasus and P. canescens or P. fruticosa. The latter three species are known to express sensitive reactions, in some cases, to infection with Prunus necrotic ring spot (PNRSV) and/or prune dwarf(PDV) ilarviruses. Furthermore, sweet cherries on some of these hybrid rootstocks have been shown to bloom earlier than on standard P. avium (Mazzard) rootstocks, raising the possibility that flower bud cold hardiness may be influenced by rootstock. Controlled freezing of 'Bing' budsticks from several of the hybrid rootstocks from Giessen, Germany, revealed apparent differences (1 to 2 degrees C) in bud hardiness in late winter, probably indicating earlier or more rapid deacclimation during ecodormancy. The magnitude of these differences varied by sample date, with Mazzard and GI 148/1 having the greatest flower bud hardiness and GI 148/2 having the least. Responses to PDV and PNRSV inoculation varied by plant age (non-bearing vs, mature). Responses could be categorized from tolerant (no apparent symptoms) to severe and lethal. All rootstocks with P. fruticosa as a parent tended to exhibit the maximum severity of response. Rootstocks with P. cerasus or P. canescens had variable responses, including differences between sibling germplasm.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 224
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NO signaling functions in the biotic and abiotic stress responses
    David Wendehenne
    Kevin Gould
    Olivier Lamotte
    Jörg Durner
    Elodie Vandelle
    David Lecourieux
    Cécile Courtois
    Laurent Barnavon
    Marc Bentéjac
    Alain Pugin
    BMC Plant Biology, 5 (Suppl 1)
  • [2] SNAREs in Plant Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses
    Kwon, Chian
    Lee, Jae-Hoon
    Yun, Hye Sup
    MOLECULES AND CELLS, 2020, 43 (06) : 501 - 508
  • [3] Biotic and Abiotic Stress Responses in Crop Plants
    Dresselhaus, Thomas
    Hueckelhoven, Ralph
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2018, 8 (11):
  • [4] Linking Autophagy to Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
    Signorelli, Santiago
    Tarkowski, Lukasz Pawel
    Van den Ende, Wim
    Bassham, Diane C.
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 24 (05) : 413 - 430
  • [5] FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS OF ABIOTIC AND BIOTIC STRESS RESPONSES IN BIRCH
    Palva, T.
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2004, 26 (03) : 299 - 299
  • [6] Regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses by plant hormones
    Prakash P. Kumar
    Plant Cell Reports, 2013, 32 : 943 - 943
  • [7] Physiological Responses to Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Forest Trees
    Polle, Andrea
    Rennenberg, Heinz
    FORESTS, 2019, 10 (09):
  • [8] Regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses by plant hormones
    Kumar, Prakash P.
    PLANT CELL REPORTS, 2013, 32 (07) : 943 - 943
  • [9] The interface between abiotic and biotic stress responses Preface
    Gassmann, Walter
    Appel, Heidi M.
    Oliver, Melvin J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2016, 67 (07) : 2023 - 2024
  • [10] Evaluation of interspecific cherry hybrids as rootstocks for sweet cherries
    Walther, E
    Franken-Bembenek, S
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL CHERRY SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, (468): : 285 - 290